Leipzig-based cloud law firm management software (Kanzleisoftware) built by docSAFE GmbH. Covers mandate processing, case management, document management, deadline tracking, messaging, billing, and analytics in a browser-based platform with iOS and Android mobile apps. Founded circa 2015-2021 (sources differ). Seed-funded by be-exponential (Jun 2021). Pricing from €59/user/month (per OMR Reviews, 4.4/5 rating, 4 reviews). GDPR-compliant per vendor claims, hosted in secured data centers (specific location undisclosed). DATEV integration available via GetMyInvoices (not native), BUCHHALTUNG ONE integration also via third-party bridge — explaining the r/recht user’s Feb 2026 complaint about imperfect accounting coupling (‘gerade die Einbindung’). SSO mentioned on GetApp. Integrates with Zapier, Google Sheets, n8n, and Regpit (regulatory compliance). Zendesk help center active. beA (besonderes elektronisches Anwaltspostfach) integration not documented — a notable gap for German practice. Head of Product: Maximilian Reinwaldt (Volljurist). Featured in Legal-Tech Magazin and LTV Magazin. Listed in CCBE report on EU legal IT capabilities alongside RA-MICRO, AdvoLux, Advoware, and other established Kanzleisoftware. German market focused — website and product entirely in German. Target appears to be small to mid-size German law firms. Facebook user forum active. Berlin phone number (030 prefix) suggests Berlin presence despite Leipzig HQ.
Company Info
- Founded: ~2021 (sources vary — some say 2015)
- HQ: Leipzig, Germany
- Sector: Legal practice management (Kanzleisoftware)
- Funding: Seed round from be-exponential (Jun 2021)
What We Haven’t Verified
- LinkedIn follower count and employee count not confirmed
- beA (besonderes elektronisches Anwaltspostfach) integration status
- Data residency and hosting details
- Security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2)
- Exact founding date (2015 vs 2021 discrepancy)
- Accounting integration noted as “not perfect” by an r/recht user (Feb 2026) — specific limitations unknown
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Actaport is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Actaport addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Client calls asking 'what's happening with my case?' — paralegal has to interrupt the attorney because matter status lives in someone's head, not a system
Solo attorney paying $500+/month across 6 different software tools that don't share data — needs one system that actually handles the basics without nickel-and-diming
Documents scattered across email, shared drives, attorney desktops, and filing cabinets — paralegal can't find the key document when it's needed for court or a deposition
Firm uses separate tools for intake, documents, billing, and e-signatures that don't talk to each other — opening a new matter means entering the same client info 4 times across systems that should but don't share data
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…