AppClose is a leading co-parenting platform that offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed to streamline communication, scheduling, and financial management for separated or divorced parents. Its mobile application facilitates real-time messaging, shared calendars, expense tracking, and secure information sharing, all aimed at reducing conflict and enhancing collaboration between co-parents. Additionally, AppClose provides court-admissible records, making it a trusted resource for legal professionals and courts across the United States.
Company Info
- Founded: 2015
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $5.6M
- HQ: United States
- Sector: Family Office
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Appclose is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Appclose addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Family law attorney needs the other spouse's Facebook posts showing lavish spending during an alimony dispute — but by the time the paralegal gets around to capturing them, the posts have been deleted, and there's no admissible record of what was there
High-conflict custody case generates hundreds of text messages, emails, and voicemails between co-parents — the family law attorney needs to find the three messages that prove a pattern of interference, but they're scattered across platforms and the client's phone screenshots are inadmissible hearsay
Board meeting prep is a quarterly fire drill — the corporate secretary scrambles to assemble board books from 6 different sources, track director consents across time zones, maintain minutes archives, and ensure governance resolutions are properly filed, all while the GC changes the agenda 48 hours before the meeting.
Patent prosecution attorney receives an office action and needs to decide whether to fight, amend, or appeal — but has no data on this specific examiner's grant rate, allowance patterns, or appeal success rate, so the strategy decision comes down to gut feel instead of evidence, and a wrong call burns through the client's prosecution budget on a losing strategy
When my litigation team receives 100,000 documents in discovery and the partner wants an early case assessment by Friday, I need to understand the key facts, players, and timeline before we've even started formal review — but right now the only option is throwing associate hours at it and hoping we surface the right documents
Couple going through a relatively straightforward uncontested divorce is quoted $10,000-15,000+ per person by traditional family law attorneys — for what amounts to filling out state-specific forms, negotiating a few asset splits, and filing paperwork. They don't need a full-service attorney for every step, but they also can't afford to mess up court filings that affect custody, property division, and their financial future. Need a middle ground between 'hire a $350/hr attorney for everything' and 'download blank forms from the court website and hope for the best'
General counsel needs outside counsel for a niche matter — employment dispute in Singapore, regulatory filing in Brazil, or patent prosecution in Germany — but their existing panel doesn't cover it, and cold-calling firms from a directory is a crapshoot
Executor inherits a loved one's estate and faces 600+ hours of paperwork — locating bank accounts, notifying agencies, filing probate, transferring titles — with zero training and while grieving
Family law attorney in a high-conflict custody modification hearing can't prove what the co-parents agreed to or how they communicated — text messages got deleted, emails are taken out of context, and the judge wants unalterable records of communication patterns, scheduling compliance, and expense sharing before making a ruling
Family law attorney recommends co-parent communication go through a court-admissible platform but the parents either refuse to use it, can't figure out the technology, or switch to texting within a week — and when contempt issues arise six months later, there's no reliable record of who said what about custody exchanges
When the court orders my clients to use a co-parenting app, I need to recommend one that's affordable enough for both parties — if one parent can't pay, the whole communication channel breaks down and I'm back to mediating text message disputes
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…