Legal Research

#479 rlegaltech500

Casemine

Est. 2014 India Updated 2026-02-10
ai
Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with Casemine

CaseMine is a legal research platform that uses AI to find connections between case laws that keyword search alone would miss. The proprietary tools surface related authorities, citations, and legal principles beyond what appears in a standard text search. Available as a web platform with research, citation analysis, and case-law mapping features.

Capabilities

Spans 7 product areas: Legal Research, Citation , Checking, Brief , Drafting and , Analysis, Court Reporting.

Workflow Coverage

Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 2 workflow areas:

  • Research & Analysis — Citation Checking, Citation Analysis
  • Communication & Collaboration

Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2014
  • Team size: 11-50 employees
  • HQ: India
  • Sector: Legal Research

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Casemine is used in these workflows:

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Casemine addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

Solo/small firm needs case law research but Westlaw and LexisNexis charge $300-500/month per user — either pay and bleed, negotiate a discount every year, or go without and risk missing relevant authority. Free alternatives (Google Scholar, Fastcase) have gaps in coverage and no citator

Research & Analysis 35 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Litigation associate searches for case law supporting a specific legal argument but keyword search returns 500+ results, most irrelevant — the actual proposition ('courts have held that X constitutes Y under Z standard') is buried across dozens of cases that happen to contain the same terms but reach different conclusions

Research & Analysis 18 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Litigation team needs to verify every citation in a 40-page brief before filing — manually checking each case reference against the original source takes a full day, and a single bad citation can result in sanctions or a lost motion

Research & Analysis 9 vendors affected mid-firm · large-firm · BigLaw (200+) · Paralegal

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…