Austrian AI-powered legal platform purpose-built for European boutique law firms. Contract drafting, legal research, and document analysis. Claims to be ‘the only hallucination-free legal AI’ by using only verified official legal sources. CEO Enikő Nőthig-Hegedüs, co-founders Albert Fabian and Juan Pablo Coelho. Vienna-based with Budapest operations. No funding (Tracxn). Featured on Artificial Lawyer (ALTV interview). Presented at ILTACON 2025. Hiring engineers and business development. YouTube demos available. Expanding beyond contracts to broader legal document drafting. No reviews on any platform. No Reddit presence.
Company Info
- HQ: Vienna, Austria
- CEO: Enikő Nőthig-Hegedüs
- Sector: Legal AI (Contract Drafting + Research)
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. The “hallucination-free” claim has not been independently verified. No product reviews found on any platform. Feature claims are based on vendor materials and press coverage.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, ClausePilot is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems ClausePilot addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Contract redlining is a nightmare — 7 rounds of Track Changes in Word, counterparty turns off tracking, and nobody knows what changed between v5 and v7
NDAs and routine contracts take 3-7 days because every single one routes through legal — no self-service for standard terms
Legal research costs $400-600/hour in associate time and takes hours of manual digging — searching Westlaw/Lexis, reading irrelevant results, synthesizing case law. Clients increasingly refuse to pay for research hours on invoices. AI can compress a 4-hour research memo into 20 minutes, but most firms have no approved tool
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…