UK-based white-label client portal and collaboration platform used by 3,000+ businesses across 40+ countries. Serves law firms as a secure document sharing, communication, and project management hub — sits alongside practice management tools like Clio rather than replacing them. Features for legal: case timelines, secure forms, task management per client workspace, document review, discussion threads, white-label branding under firm’s own domain. Practice-area agnostic — any firm needing client document sharing, not tailored to specific practice areas. Founded 2008, 18 employees, $1.16M total funding (bootstrapped/lean). SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified; also complies with SAS70, PCI, GDPR. SAML SSO supported (Google, LinkedIn, SAML). REST API v3 available. Zapier integrations. Mobile apps (iOS/Android). G2: 4.8/5 (147 reviews), Capterra: 4.9/5 (110 reviews). Pricing starts at $77/mo (Lite, 100 users + unlimited guests); vendor site currently shows $239/mo Standard, $479/mo Premium (G2 may reflect annual/promotional pricing). White-label capability. Also functions as a Virtual Data Room. Integrates with DocuSign.
Company Info
- Founded: 2008
- Team size: 11-50 employees
- Funding: $1.2M
- HQ: United Kingdom
- Sector: Document Management & Storage, Client Portals & Communications
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Clinked is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Clinked addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Client calls asking 'what's happening with my case?' — paralegal has to interrupt the attorney because matter status lives in someone's head, not a system
Documents scattered across email, shared drives, attorney desktops, and filing cabinets — paralegal can't find the key document when it's needed for court or a deposition
Solo or small firm attorney pays $25-50/month per user for DocuSign or Adobe Sign just to get engagement letters and retainer agreements signed — the firm sends maybe 15 documents a month and doesn't need enterprise features, but there's no middle ground between free tools with no audit trail and expensive enterprise platforms
Small firm attorney shares case documents with clients via email attachments and Dropbox links — has no way to know if the client actually opened the file, and no audit trail when opposing counsel claims the document was never provided
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Clinked
Attorney opens matter in practice management tool (Clio, MyCase) → needs to share documents and communicate with client securely
After Clinked
Client reviews documents in portal → provides approvals/feedback via secure forms → documents finalized → filed or executed (via DocuSign integration)
Integrations & hand-offs
Sits alongside practice management (Clio, MyCase) — not a replacement. DocuSign integration for e-signatures. Zapier for monday.com and other tools. REST API v3 for custom integrations. VDR mode for deal-related document sharing. White-label allows branding as firm's own portal. SAML SSO for centralized authentication. Setup: basic portal running within 1-2 weeks per vendor blog.
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…