AI-powered prior art search and patent claim chart generation platform. Analyzes 80+ million prior art references using semantic technologies and AI. Creates claim charts automatically. Subscription plans: Standard, Premium, Enterprise. Serves patent offices, law firms, companies, and IP stakeholders. Award-winning (per TLTF description). 5 employees, 78 LinkedIn followers, 0 EV. Reclassified from case-management to ip-management — this is patent search/analytics, not case management.
Company Info
- Founded: 2013
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $122K
- HQ: United States
- Sector: Case Management
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Datanovo Inc is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Datanovo Inc addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Patent attorney conducting a prior art search for a client's invention spends 2-3 days manually searching USPTO, EPO, and non-patent literature databases — reading hundreds of abstracts, mapping claims to prior art references, and still worrying they missed something in a Chinese or Japanese patent that wasn't translated. The search costs the client $5,000-15,000 and the attorney still can't guarantee completeness
Litigation team preparing a patent invalidity defence needs to find prior art that anticipates or renders obvious each claim element — manually building claim charts across dozens of references takes weeks and costs $50-100K in associate time, and missing one key reference could lose the case
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…