Deeligence is an Australian-founded due-diligence workflow platform for transactional lawyers and deal teams. It sits between the data room and the final client report: teams assign review work, track changing uploads across Ansarada/Intralinks/Datasite/Google Drive/SharePoint, run AI contract screening and clause summaries, and export client-ready Word reports in house style. Public evidence is still heavily vendor-authored, but the case studies are more concrete than most early-stage legal-AI vendors: Mayne Wetherell reports 75+ lawyer hours saved on one large transaction and says the firm decided it will not run transactions without the tool; HopgoodGanim says lawyers completed reviews up to 83% faster and only needed 20 minutes of training; Cowell Clarke reports ~70+ hours saved on an average diligence and 92.5% AI accuracy before lawyer review; GrilloHiggins reports 15+ hours saved on an average diligence plus live in-scope indexing on changing Google Drive matters. Founded in 2022 by Elena Tsalanidis and Justin Hansky. Public press confirms an AUD $1M pre-seed round in April 2024, while the vendor stub and TLTF data indicate roughly $1.7M total funding. Pricing is not public: the vendor offers a pilot with core features and personalised support, then moves buyers onto subscription plans discussed in demo. Security claims mention ISO 27001 compliance, encryption, MFA, and regular security audits, but no public SOC 2 report, SSO/SAML detail, security whitepaper, DPA, or data-residency documentation was surfaced.
Company Info
- Founded: 2022
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $1.7M
- HQ: Canada
- Sector: In-House Automation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Deeligence is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Deeligence addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
In-house legal team reviews 200+ vendor and customer contracts per quarter with inconsistent quality — junior attorneys miss risks that senior attorneys would catch, there's no standardised review checklist, and the playbook lives in a senior attorney's head rather than a system
When my litigation team receives 100,000 documents in discovery and the partner wants an early case assessment by Friday, I need to understand the key facts, players, and timeline before we've even started formal review — but right now the only option is throwing associate hours at it and hoping we surface the right documents
Corporate associate managing M&A due diligence needs to share 2,000 documents with the buyer's counsel in a structured data room — but the firm's general-purpose file sharing (SharePoint, Dropbox) has no granular permission controls, no audit trail of who viewed what, and no way to revoke access after the deal closes or falls through
Company acquiring another business inherits 10,000 contracts scattered across legacy systems, filing cabinets, and departed employees' hard drives — the legal team needs to know what obligations they've inherited but it would take 6 months to manually review everything
PE fund acquisition team needs due diligence on a target company in 72 hours — associates manually read hundreds of deal documents, extract key terms into spreadsheets, and compare against prior deals, spending days on mechanical extraction when the clock is ticking on a competitive bid
Lawyer reading a 200-page contract or regulatory filing highlights passages and takes notes in the margins of a PDF, but two weeks later when writing the memo can't remember why they highlighted something or how page 12 connects to the clause on page 187
Attorney heading to court or a client meeting needs to pull up a document from iManage or NetDocuments on their phone — but the DMS doesn't have a usable mobile app, so they're forwarding documents to personal email or taking photos of their laptop screen before leaving the office
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…