Digify (digify.com) is a virtual data room (VDR) and document security platform founded in 2011, headquartered in Singapore with US presence. Core offering: secure document sharing with DRM (Digital Rights Management) that persists after download — dynamic watermarking, screenshot protection, access revocation, and granular permissions across PDF, Office, and image formats. Used primarily by PE/VC funds, M&A advisors, startups fundraising, mid-market law firms, and real estate firms for due diligence, deal rooms, and confidential document exchange. 600,000+ professionals globally. Pricing: Pro $140/month ($98/mo annual, flat-rate, unlimited users), Team $350/month, Enterprise custom — positioned as the affordable alternative to Datasite/Intralinks ($200K+ for enterprise M&A deals). G2: 4.7/5 (183 reviews), ranked #1 Easiest To Use in VDR software. Capterra: 4.8-4.9/5 (174 reviews). SelectHub: 97% satisfaction across 247 reviews from 4 platforms. Key differentiator: post-download document protection (PPAD) — documents remain DRM-protected even after being downloaded, with persistent tracking and access revocation. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified (vendor-claimed on their security page — audit dates and auditor identity not independently verified). AES-256 encryption, GDPR/HIPAA compliant. SAML SSO supported (confirmed via OneLogin SAML app catalog). REST API at developer.digify.com. Zapier integration connects to 6,000+ apps. Native integrations with Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Box. No native iManage or NetDocuments integration — a significant gap for large law firms with DMS governance. No BigLaw/AmLaw adoption evidence found; sweet spot is mid-market deals ($5M-$200M). VDR market worth $3.2B by 2026 (MarketsandMarkets); Digify is a niche player. 47 employees. $589K seed funding (2019, per Wellfound) with no subsequent rounds — sustainability risk vs. multi-billion competitors. Branded search volume: 1,000/month. LinkedIn: 20,741 followers. Competes with Datasite, Intralinks, Ansarada (enterprise), iDeals, Firmex (mid-market), DocSend, Onehub (low-end). Case studies: Cocoon Capital ($21M+ raised), Hemisphere Partners (cross-border M&A), ThoughtRiver (due diligence). Data room setup is per-deal (minutes, not months) — fundamentally different from CLM or practice management implementations. Paralegal or litigation support staff typically build and manage data rooms at law firms, not the partners who initiate deals. For solo practitioners, $140/mo may be overkill for low deal volumes — Google Drive with password-protected PDFs may suffice; Digify makes more sense when deal value or confidentiality requirements justify the security premium.
Company Info
- Founded: 2011
- Team size: 11-50 employees
- Funding: $589K
- HQ: Singapore
- Sector: Document Management & Storage
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Digify is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Digify addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Signed contracts vanish into email threads and shared drives — when a dispute arises, nobody can find the executed version
PE fund acquires portfolio company and needs clean org charts, entity registers, and compliance status for exit due diligence — but entity data is scattered across spreadsheets, minute books, and outside counsel files, director lists are stale, and filing compliance status across 15 jurisdictions is uncertain, slowing the deal by weeks
MDL or mass tort coordinating counsel needs to manage document exchange among 40+ plaintiff firms, defense counsel, and the transferee court — filings need to reach all parties simultaneously, the court wants a single organized case file, and the Special Master is demanding a reliable system for tracking what was served to whom and when, but email chains with 200 attorneys are unmanageable and PACER alone does not handle the volume of inter-party communications
Patent attorney conducting a prior art search for a client's invention spends 2-3 days manually searching USPTO, EPO, and non-patent literature databases — reading hundreds of abstracts, mapping claims to prior art references, and still worrying they missed something in a Chinese or Japanese patent that wasn't translated. The search costs the client $5,000-15,000 and the attorney still can't guarantee completeness
Litigation team preparing a patent invalidity defence needs to find prior art that anticipates or renders obvious each claim element — manually building claim charts across dozens of references takes weeks and costs $50-100K in associate time, and missing one key reference could lose the case
Mid-market M&A deal requires a data room to share 3,000 documents with counterparty counsel, but the incumbent VDR providers want $2,000/month minimum with a 12-month commitment — for a deal that closes in 8 weeks
Corporate associate managing M&A due diligence needs to share 2,000 documents with the buyer's counsel in a structured data room — but the firm's general-purpose file sharing (SharePoint, Dropbox) has no granular permission controls, no audit trail of who viewed what, and no way to revoke access after the deal closes or falls through
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…