Leading expert witness platform for litigation. Expert iQ is the cloud-based case management and expert consulting portal. Core products: Expert Search (custom expert recruiting from 1M+ vetted experts across every specialty), Expert Radar (AI-driven opposing expert research — Daubert challenges, testimonial history, prior exclusions), Case Clinics (in-house physician medical record reviews), and Strategic Research. Expert iQ centralizes expert communications, case files, billing, and AI-organized deposition transcripts/court exhibits. 55,800 LinkedIn followers. NYC-based. Targets plaintiff firms and litigation departments at firms of all sizes. Named in press as ‘largest expert witness recruiting firm.’ Medical malpractice testimonial: ‘Virtually every case our firm takes on goes through Expert Institute’s Medical Record Review process.‘
Capabilities
Spans 10 product areas: Case Management, Matter Management, Litigation , Analytics, Litigation Management and Trial Preparation, Web and , Social , Media , Monitoring and , Capture.
Workflow Coverage
Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 7 workflow areas:
- Document Review & Management — Document Management, Litigation Management, Exhibit Management
- Client & Matter Lifecycle — Client Intake
- Filing & Compliance — timelines, Audit Trail Logging, Timelines
- Document Drafting & Automation — Contract Management, Transaction Management
- Billing, Time & Finance — Matter budgeting
- Firm Operations & Growth — Task Management
- Research & Analysis
Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Expert Iq is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Expert Iq addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Medical records arrive as 500-2,000 page PDFs that a paralegal spends 8-20 hours manually reading and summarising into a chronology — the bottleneck that delays every PI demand
Litigation team preparing for trial needs to understand how a specific judge rules on summary judgment motions, Daubert challenges, and sentencing — but there's no systematic analytics on judge behavior, so strategy relies on anecdotes from colleagues who've appeared before that judge
Litigation partner needs an expert witness in underwater welding metallurgy for a maritime injury case — the paralegal spends two weeks cold-calling university departments and professional associations, the expert they find has never testified before, and the opposing counsel's Daubert challenge succeeds because nobody checked the expert's litigation history
In-house compliance team or regulatory attorney tracks changes across 50+ government agency websites, court rules committees, and international regulatory bodies — manually checking each one weekly means missing critical changes until a client or auditor asks about them, and by then the firm's advice is based on outdated rules that could expose the client to penalties
Government records officer gets a FOIA request for social media posts from 18 months ago — the agency's Twitter account has 12,000 posts, nobody saved the deleted ones, and the agency has 10 business days to respond before the requester escalates. Manual scrolling through social media history is not a compliance strategy
Company gets a letter saying beneficial ownership reports are due under the Corporate Transparency Act — they have 40 LLCs across 8 states, each with different beneficial owners, and nobody has a centralized record of who owns what percentage or their current addresses, so the compliance officer is scrambling to collect SSNs and passport copies from dozens of individuals before the deadline
Fund formation partner closes a $200M fund with 40 LPs — each investor gets a 50-page subscription agreement that needs to be customized based on their entity type, tax status, and regulatory jurisdiction, and the paralegal spends 3 weeks chasing investors for correct signatures, missing pages, and illegible responses before the fund can actually close
Personal injury attorney evaluating a potential medical malpractice case needs a physician to review 500 pages of medical records to determine if there's merit before investing $50,000 in litigation — but getting a qualified doctor to review records takes 6 weeks, costs $5,000, and the statute of limitations is ticking
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…