Category-creating client experience platform enabling law firms to sell, deliver, and scale subscription and flat-fee legal services. No-code platform with firm-branded client portal, AI-powered subscription/flat-fee plan builder (<10 min setup), client project management, automated service delivery workflows, and resource/knowledge base features. Core features: Services (packaged offerings), Projects (delivery tracking), Pages (client-facing content), Resources (knowledge base). Founded Oct 2019 by Kimberly Bennett (co-founder, ABA Law Practice Magazine contributor). 14-day free trial. Integrates with Clio (confirmed via Clio App Directory), LawPay, Gravity Legal, and Confido Legal. Named to Clio’s ‘Top 15 Legal Technology Companies’ (Nov 2024). Co-founder published in ABA Law Practice Magazine (Sep 2023) on subscription services and the justice gap. Featured at ABA TECHSHOW 2023, LawNext Startup Alley, Cascadia Capital legal tech report (2024). Clio blog (Dec 2025) recommends Fidu for subscription transitions. Mathew Kerbis (‘most affordable attorney in America’) uses Fidu. No direct competitors in the dedicated subscription law firm platform space — G2 lists general PMS tools as ‘alternatives.’ The broader market trend toward alternative fee arrangements (American Lawyer, Dec 2025) supports Fidu’s thesis. Primarily relevant to consumer-facing practice areas (estate planning, immigration, family law, GC as a service) where subscription models are most viable. 2-person team, 438 LinkedIn followers, $133K funding. LawNext: 1 review at 5/5. No G2 or Capterra reviews found. Help center and quickstart onboarding guide exist. No security certifications disclosed.
Company Info
- Founded: 2019
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $133.1K
- HQ: Canada
- Sector: Legal Research
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Fidu is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Fidu addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Solo/small attorney sees the market moving toward flat-fee unbundled legal services (estate plans, LLC formations, uncontested divorces) but can't build client-facing intake-to-document-to-payment workflows without custom software development or expensive consultants — the gap between 'I know this should be automated' and actually doing it is too wide
Plaintiff attorney shifts to flat-fee or contingency-plus models but has no way to price cases accurately without knowing how much attorney time each case type actually consumes — AI changes the cost structure but billing hasn't caught up
Law firm's collections process is a manual afterthought — aging AR spreadsheet updated weekly, billing coordinator sends courtesy emails when they remember, partners don't follow up on their own clients' unpaid invoices, and write-offs climb to 5-10% of billed revenue because there's no systematic follow-up workflow or visibility into who owes what
Family law solo practitioner wants to offer affordable unbundled services — document review, limited-scope representation, mediation — to the growing market of people who can't afford full representation but need more than a DIY form tool. But building a client self-service portal, automating state-specific forms, handling intake and scheduling, and marketing to price-sensitive consumers is a full startup's worth of work for a one-attorney shop
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…