Fintelligence is a Latvian AML/KYC and adverse-media screening platform for banks, investment firms, law firms, and enterprises that need fast reputation and sanctions checks on customers, counterparties, vendors, or prospects. The product offers web-based entity screening, sanctions and PEP checks, ownership/relationship mapping, PDF report generation, and a REST API. Vendor-claimed legal relevance is supported by homepage customer logos from Cobalt Legal, NJORD Law, and GLIMSTEDT Latvia, plus a dedicated law-firm use case describing risk screening, AML compliance, and investigation support. Independent coverage is thin: startup press from 2021 describes founder Līga Vinķele building the product after validating a customer-intelligence need with Latvian banks, and the EU funding portal describes a tool for gathering publicly accessible information for risk detection. No public pricing, review-platform signal, or documented enterprise-security posture was found. Competitor framing from the company’s pitch deck centers on Dow Jones, Refinitiv, LexisNexis, and ComplyAdvantage. The product is real and relevant to compliance-heavy legal work, but its popularity score was inflated by keyword collision and should not remain in the rlegaltech1000 queue on current evidence.
Company Info
- Founded: 2020
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $56.6K
- HQ: Germany
- Sector: Governance/Compliance/Risk Management
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Fintelligence is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Fintelligence addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Company gets a letter saying beneficial ownership reports are due under the Corporate Transparency Act — they have 40 LLCs across 8 states, each with different beneficial owners, and nobody has a centralized record of who owns what percentage or their current addresses, so the compliance officer is scrambling to collect SSNs and passport copies from dozens of individuals before the deadline
Fund manager's compliance team needs to verify KYC/AML for every LP in a new fund — 40 investors across 12 jurisdictions, each with different beneficial ownership structures, and the 31 CFR deadline is approaching while half the investors haven't submitted their compliance documentation
When a law firm is about to open a cross-border matter or act for a new counterparty, conflicts is not enough — they need sanctions, PEP, adverse-media, and ownership screening in one report before the engagement goes live, so they do not inherit AML risk or explain later why nobody checked the red flags.
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Fintelligence
A law firm, fund manager, or compliance team receives a new client, investor, bidder, vendor, or litigation target and needs more than a conflicts check before proceeding.
After Fintelligence
After Fintelligence generates screening results and a PDF report, the team decides whether to onboard, escalate for enhanced due diligence, or document why the risk was cleared.
Integrations & hand-offs
Matter intake or customer onboarding system -> Fintelligence web app/API for sanctions, PEP, adverse-media, and ownership screening -> PDF report or analyst review -> matter opening, transaction approval, or escalation to manual AML/compliance review.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…