Brazilian legal intelligence vendor founded in 2018. The core product, JUIT Rimor, is a jurisprudence research and jurimetry platform covering all 92 Brazilian courts, with AI-assisted search, precedent analysis, and judge-profile analytics. The company also appears to market TimeJur, a separate lawsuit-monitoring product for new case filings and procedural updates, but the branded evidence around JUIT itself is overwhelmingly about research rather than matter management. Third-party listings show subscription pricing starting at R$249.90/month. Independent coverage is thin but real: FGV highlighted JUIT as Brazil’s most innovative legaltech in a case-law analysis category, IE profiled the company, and Brazilian Reddit threads mention lawyers using it for jurisprudence research.
Company Info
- Founded: 2018
- Team size: 11-50 employees
- Funding: $200K
- HQ: Brazil
- Sector: Legal Research, Case Management
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Juit is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Juit addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Legal research costs $400-600/hour in associate time and takes hours of manual digging — searching Westlaw/Lexis, reading irrelevant results, synthesizing case law. Clients increasingly refuse to pay for research hours on invoices. AI can compress a 4-hour research memo into 20 minutes, but most firms have no approved tool
Litigation associate searches for case law supporting a specific legal argument but keyword search returns 500+ results, most irrelevant — the actual proposition ('courts have held that X constitutes Y under Z standard') is buried across dozens of cases that happen to contain the same terms but reach different conclusions
Litigation team preparing for trial needs to understand how a specific judge rules on summary judgment motions, Daubert challenges, and sentencing — but there's no systematic analytics on judge behavior, so strategy relies on anecdotes from colleagues who've appeared before that judge
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Juit
Lawyer receives a new dispute, appeal, or research-heavy question and needs to understand precedent fast. In some workflows, TimeJur appears to sit even earlier by alerting firms to new lawsuits or case movements before the research phase begins.
After Juit
JUIT research feeds into petition drafting, motion strategy, settlement posture, and internal legal advice. If a firm also uses TimeJur, the alerting workflow can hand off into a broader matter-management stack outside JUIT itself.
Integrations & hand-offs
Court data and precedent search -> JUIT analysis -> lawyer memo or brief drafting -> filing or client advice. Separate TimeJur alerts appear to hand off into the firm's existing case-management or docketing process rather than replacing it.
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…