Jurisage is an early-stage Canadian legal-research vendor whose clearest public wedge is citation triage inside the lawyer’s existing workflow rather than a full replacement for Westlaw or Lexis. The original MyJr product is a browser extension that lets a researcher hover over cited authorities on any webpage and decide whether a case is worth opening, aiming squarely at the ‘do I need to read this?’ problem. Since the September 2023 merger with CiteRight, Jurisage’s public product surface has broadened into a wider litigation-drafting stack: a Table of Authorities builder, Microsoft Word-adjacent litigation workflow, case dashboards, and a Drafting Board that combines research, precedents, drafting, and collaboration. Public traction is real but still thin: the company emerged from the AltaML / Compass Law joint venture, completed the CiteRight merger on January 10, 2024, and shows only light independent review evidence beyond the LawNext directory and scattered press coverage. The strongest defensible story is that Jurisage helps litigators and research-heavy lawyers read fewer irrelevant cases, keep cited authorities in context, and move faster from research into drafting without exploding their tab count.
Capabilities
Spans 10 product areas: Legal Research, Litigation , Analytics, Brief , Drafting and , Analysis, Find the , Law (, Consumer , Research).
Workflow Coverage
Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 1 workflow area:
- Research & Analysis — Citation Checking, Citation Analysis
Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.
Company Info
- Founded: 2021
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: Canada
- Sector: Case Management, Litigation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Jurisage is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Jurisage addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
When I'm halfway through a research memo or factum and every case I open spawns five more citations, I want to know whether a cited authority is actually worth reading before I open another tab, so I can finish the analysis without losing the thread, over-researching, or writing off the time.
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Jurisage
A lawyer is reading cases, briefs, or authorities inside a browser or drafting environment and needs to decide which citations matter, what to reuse from prior work, and how to move research into a filing-ready document.
After Jurisage
Researchers triage cited authorities, open only the cases that matter, reuse relevant precedents or research artifacts, then continue drafting in Word or Jurisage's broader post-merger tooling such as CiteRight, Drafting Board, or TOA Builder.
Integrations & hand-offs
Legal research platform / public web page / Word draft -> MyJr citation popup and case dashboard -> Drafting Board / CiteRight / TOA Builder for drafting and filing preparation.
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…