Ktmine

Est. 2008 United States Updated 2026-02-10
Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with Ktmine

ktMINE is specialized IP data infrastructure for licensing, valuation, commercialization, and law-firm research rather than a general IP management suite. The strongest public evidence is specific: the Royalty Rates App exposes full-text agreements and analyst-reviewed summaries for comparables work; the Commercialization App is built for tech transfer and licensing professionals negotiating strategic terms; an Am Law 200 case study shows attorneys accessing live analytics inside a firm portal; and Wolters Kluwer publicly positions ktMINE as giving law practices an edge in IP research. The product belongs in-scope when described as lawyer-facing IP intelligence and comparables research, but public pricing, reviews, and security posture remain thin.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2008
  • Team size: 11-50 employees
  • HQ: United States
  • Sector: IP

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Ktmine is used in these workflows:

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Ktmine addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

IP department managing a portfolio of 500 patents across 12 art units has no systematic way to benchmark their prosecution outcomes — are their allowance rates above or below average? Are they spending more per patent than comparable portfolios? Nobody knows until the annual outside counsel review

Research & Analysis 5 vendors affected in-house-counsel · legal-ops

Licensing counsel, damages expert, or valuation team is negotiating a patent or trademark deal and needs defensible royalty comparables fast — but the useful agreements are buried across SEC exhibits, partial databases, and long PDFs, so they spend days hunting, filtering, and sanity-checking comps before they can even argue what a market rate looks like

Research & Analysis Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200) · In-house counsel · Legal ops

Technology-transfer or commercialization team has an invention that finally has market interest, but nobody knows what similar IP licensed for, which fields of use were carved out, or what a realistic royalty structure looks like — so negotiations start half-blind and the institution risks underpricing the asset or overreaching and killing the deal

Research & Analysis Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200) · In-house counsel · Government

Where it fits in your workflow

Before Ktmine

Licensing negotiation, IP valuation, commercialization planning, or patent-strategy work triggers a need for comparable agreements, royalty rates, or portfolio benchmarking data.

After Ktmine

The resulting comp set or analytics feed valuation models, negotiation positions, expert reports, commercialization strategy, or internal law-firm client advice.

Integrations & hand-offs

ktMINE sits before docketing, prosecution, or final contract drafting: researchers, licensing teams, and lawyers use it to assemble data and comparables, then hand the analysis into negotiation, valuation memos, or client strategy work. API/Data Delivery also suggests embedding the data into existing platforms rather than forcing a standalone workflow.

Also used by similar teams

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…