Cloud-native SaaS platform for managing IP portfolios, primarily focused on trademarks. Covers docketing, automated registry searches, watching, analytics, and matter management. API-first architecture with documented .NET client on GitHub. Founded by Mark Kingsley-Williams (also founded Trade Mark Direct/TMDNet in 2008), Sebastian Guerrero, and Thomas Brattli. TMDNet is the services company; LawPanel is the technology platform powering it — TMDNet uses LawPanel for trademark watching services, providing real B2B usage evidence. Pre-seed stage. Denmark-based with UK connections (member of Eagle Lab in partnership with the Law Society). 3-person team generating $629K revenue (GetLatka 2024) — impressive efficiency but raises support capacity concerns. 4.7/5 on Capterra (14 reviews) but GoodFirms has zero reviews. Glassdoor has 1 employee review (3/5). Login page self-describes as ‘The online trademark management platform.’ Pricing not publicly listed. Privacy policy references UK Data Protection Act but no ISO 27001 or SOC 2. Note: founder Mark Kingsley-Williams may now be focused on AILA AI Ltd per LinkedIn — active development status of LawPanel should be verified.
Company Info
- Founded: 2016
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: United Kingdom
- Sector: IP
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Lawpanel is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Lawpanel addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Trademark clearance search costs $1,500-3,000 through an attorney and takes weeks — startups and small businesses either skip it (risking a cease-and-desist) or use free tools that miss common law marks and state registrations
In-house IP team managing 5,000+ patents across 40 countries tracks renewal deadlines, annuity payments, and maintenance fees in spreadsheets — a missed deadline in one jurisdiction means losing patent protection permanently, and the cost of defensive re-filing (if even possible) dwarfs the renewal fee
Corporate IP department needs to report to management on the full cost of maintaining its patent portfolio — filing fees, attorney fees, annuity payments, translation costs across 30+ jurisdictions — but the data lives in three different systems (docketing, billing, and the annuity service provider) and nobody can produce a single view of portfolio economics without weeks of manual reconciliation
Trademark attorney switching from legacy docketing system faces a painful migration — years of portfolio data trapped in an old platform, and the idea of manually re-entering thousands of marks is enough to stay on the bad system
R&D team submits invention disclosures into a black box — they never hear back about patent decisions, don't understand why some inventions get filed and others don't, and eventually stop submitting because the process feels pointless
IP department managing a portfolio of 500 patents across 12 art units has no systematic way to benchmark their prosecution outcomes — are their allowance rates above or below average? Are they spending more per patent than comparable portfolios? Nobody knows until the annual outside counsel review
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…