Legalex is a litigation-support workflow platform for process serving, court e-filing, skip tracing, and related court-services ordering from inside case-management systems. The strongest public evidence is not a standalone product site but partner pages: Filevine says firms can send process-service and court-filing orders directly from Filevine, with proofs, invoices, and file-stamped documents synced back to the case record, while Sikich says its Litify integration lets staff initiate requests from the matter record, auto-populate service orders, and track real-time status updates. Legalex was acquired by Counsel Press on June 5, 2025, and its former domain now redirects to Proceed Legal, where the brand continues as ‘a Proceed Service.’ No public pricing, G2/Capterra footprint, or security certification evidence was found.
Company Info
- Founded: 2018
- HQ: United States
- Sector: Litigation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Legalex is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Legalex addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Court filing is a logistics nightmare — every jurisdiction has different rules (e-filing vs paper, specific cover sheets, local requirements), deadlines are non-negotiable, and small firms can't afford a full-time filing runner or courthouse messenger
Process serving is unreliable and hard to track — defendant avoiding service, wrong address, server doesn't show up, and you need proof of service documentation across multiple cases in multiple jurisdictions before the hearing date
Litigation paralegal spends 20 minutes per filing switching between the case management system and the eFiling portal — downloading documents from one, uploading to the other, re-entering case numbers and party names that already exist in the CMS
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Legalex
Matter already exists in Filevine, Litify, or another CMS -> litigation staff needs process service, e-filing, skip tracing, or investigation support -> order launched from the case record with matter and party details prefilled
After Legalex
Legalex or its service network executes the filing/service work -> status updates return to the matter -> proofs of service, file-stamped documents, and invoices sync back into the case record or timeline
Integrations & hand-offs
Case-management system -> Legalex order layer -> court clerks, e-filing endpoints, or process servers -> Legalex returns status and documents -> case-management system stores proofs, invoices, and filed copies
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…