Legal Research

Let S Think

Est. 2022 United Kingdom Updated 2026-02-10
Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with Let S Think

Let’s Think is a UK legal-tech startup focused on a narrower and more credible problem than generic legal AI: surfacing the tacit expertise of senior lawyers and turning it into reusable knowledge assets that junior lawyers and wider teams can access when they need it. The product is not really a classic external legal-research engine; it is closer to a law-firm knowledge exchange and expertise-capture layer for finding, preserving, and operationalising firm know-how that would otherwise stay trapped in individual partners’ heads or buried in precedent graveyards. Public proof is still limited, but the Kingsley Napley collaboration, LawtechUK ecosystem presence, and Geeklawblog coverage give it more third-party context than many early-stage vendors in this batch.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2022
  • Team size: 1-10 employees
  • HQ: United Kingdom
  • Sector: Technology, Information and Internet

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Let S Think is used in these workflows:

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Let S Think addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

BigLaw firm with 1,000+ lawyers has decades of work product locked in DMS folders — the precedent brief the partner drafted 3 years ago is unfindable, institutional knowledge walks out the door when partners leave, and junior associates waste hours recreating work that already exists somewhere in the system

Research & Analysis 32 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Legal ops · In-house counsel

BigLaw partner tells associate to 'draft it like the Jones deal' but the associate joined after that deal closed — institutional knowledge walks out the door when lawyers leave, and there's no system to capture and transfer negotiation expertise

Research & Analysis 10 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Legal ops

Law firm's knowledge management system is a SharePoint graveyard — thousands of precedent documents, know-how articles, and practice guides that nobody can find because the search is terrible and nobody maintains the taxonomy, so associates reinvent the wheel on every matter

Firm Operations & Growth 7 vendors affected legal-ops · small-firm-partner · Legal ops · Large firm (51–200)

Where it fits in your workflow

Before Let S Think

A law firm has valuable know-how buried in senior lawyers' memories, outdated repositories, or poorly structured precedents, while junior lawyers need quicker access to the firm's real judgment and practice-specific approaches.

After Let S Think

Captured expertise feeds into faster matter ramp-up, more consistent drafting and advice, quicker junior training, and better reuse of institutional knowledge across matters and teams.

Integrations & hand-offs

Senior lawyer reflection and know-how capture -> Let's Think Knowledge Exchange structures the expertise -> juniors and matter teams retrieve the firm's guidance -> drafting, client advice, research, and training happen with less reinvention. Kingsley Napley has publicly described working with Let's Think to apply this model in practice.

Also used by similar teams

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…