Bangladesh’s first AI-powered legal research platform. Online database of Bangladeshi case laws, statutes, codes, and gazettes with advanced search capabilities. Also described as providing case management features. Built by Silver Circle Tech Limited / Qtec Solution. HQ: Dhaka, Bangladesh. Founded ~2021. 2 employees, 238 LinkedIn followers. Won Bangladesh round of Global Legal Hackathon. Listed in Asia Law Portal ‘55 Legal Tech Companies in Asia to Follow in 2023.’ Addresses the same jurisdiction gap as YourMunshi (Pakistan) — leading legal AI tools built for US/UK common law don’t cover Bangladeshi law.
Company Info
- Founded: 2020
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: Germany
- Sector: Legal Research
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Lex Intell is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Lex Intell addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Legal research costs $400-600/hour in associate time and takes hours of manual digging — searching Westlaw/Lexis, reading irrelevant results, synthesizing case law. Clients increasingly refuse to pay for research hours on invoices. AI can compress a 4-hour research memo into 20 minutes, but most firms have no approved tool
Solo/small firm needs case law research but Westlaw and LexisNexis charge $300-500/month per user — either pay and bleed, negotiate a discount every year, or go without and risk missing relevant authority. Free alternatives (Google Scholar, Fastcase) have gaps in coverage and no citator
Litigation associate searches for case law supporting a specific legal argument but keyword search returns 500+ results, most irrelevant — the actual proposition ('courts have held that X constitutes Y under Z standard') is buried across dozens of cases that happen to contain the same terms but reach different conclusions
European lawyers working in civil law jurisdictions need AI-powered research but every leading tool is built for US/UK common law — the legal reasoning is different, the source hierarchies are different, and the tools don't understand local codes, doctrine, or case law traditions
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…