Comprehensive database of SEC EDGAR Item 601 exhibits — material contracts, certificates of trust, and other corporate legal documents filed with the SEC. Listed on LawNext Directory under both Legal Research and Contract Review/Analysis categories. Offers API access. Targets law students, junior associates, and corporate legal teams needing contract precedents and drafting templates from actual filed documents. By LEXamples, Inc., New York, NY. 281 LinkedIn followers. Referenced by Adams Drafting (Ken Adams) as early as 2014 for SEC contract retrieval. Offers LawNext discount. Also useful for shareholder activism research (listed on CorpGov.net). Very niche — SEC filing-specific contract database.
Capabilities
Spans 3 product areas: Knowledge Management, Contract Review and Analysis (Post Signature), Legal Research.
Workflow Coverage
Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 8 workflow areas:
- Document Drafting & Automation — Approval Process Management, Collaborative Drafting and Editing, Contract Clause and Content Management, Contract Attachments Support (+8 more)
- Research & Analysis — Reports and Dashboards, Citation Checking
- Document Review & Management — Version Control
- Client & Matter Lifecycle — Buyer/Seller Qualifications Tracking, Completion Status Tracking
- Firm Operations & Growth — Integrations with CRMs, Proposal and RFP Generation
- Billing, Time & Finance — Pricing Integration, Quotes Preparation
- Filing & Compliance — Compliance Tracking
- Communication & Collaboration — Mobile Access to Contracts in Progress
Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Lexamples is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Lexamples addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
BigLaw firm with 1,000+ lawyers has decades of work product locked in DMS folders — the precedent brief the partner drafted 3 years ago is unfindable, institutional knowledge walks out the door when partners leave, and junior associates waste hours recreating work that already exists somewhere in the system
IP boutique pitching for a new patent case needs to show the client their track record in the specific venue and before the assigned judge — but compiling this competitive intelligence manually from PACER filings takes days and the data is always incomplete
Third-year associate drafting an M&A purchase agreement spends 4-8 hours searching for the right precedent clause across the firm's DMS — they know a senior partner negotiated the exact provision last year but can't find it, so they redraft from scratch or use an outdated template
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…