AI-enhanced litigation case management and analysis platform with two product tracks: (1) spreadsheet-style case management with smart tables, fact extraction, document annotations, and AI insights; (2) case outcome visualization and decision tree analysis for litigation risk assessment. Founded by IP lawyer Len Hickey. Used by Osler (major Canadian law firm) for decision analysis (per Lexpert, Nov 2022). Hosted on AWS. Per-case pricing with free and paid tiers. Covered by Artificial Lawyer (walk-through, May 2025), LegalTech Hub (product briefing), and LawNext directory. Also described by McGonigle Law as using AI to predict outcomes. ~112 LinkedIn followers. No Reddit. No G2 reviews.
Capabilities
Spans 2 product areas: Case Management, Compliance and Risk Management.
Workflow Coverage
Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 2 workflow areas:
- Client & Matter Lifecycle
- Filing & Compliance
Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.
Company Info
- Founded: 2021
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: Australia
- Sector: Litigation, Governance/Compliance/Risk Management
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Litigaze is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Litigaze addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Litigation team building a case chronology across 50,000 documents, 30 depositions, and hundreds of exhibits does it in Excel or Word — no single platform connects facts, people, events, and evidence into a searchable timeline, so critical connections between a witness statement and a document are missed
Litigation attorney drafting a motion for summary judgment needs to link every factual assertion to the specific page in the deposition transcript or exhibit that supports it — manually cross-referencing 3,000 pages of discovery against 30 pages of brief takes two full days, and a single unsupported factual statement gives opposing counsel ammunition to strike
Litigation paralegal gets a 500-page case file and needs to build a chronology for trial prep — reading every document, extracting dates and facts, and organizing them into a timeline takes 3 days of manual work that could be spent on actual case strategy
Plaintiff lawyer is about to send a demand letter or walk into mediation with a case that could be worth far more than the insurer's first offer, but they're still guessing which facts, videos, and witness moments actually make jurors or mediators care — traditional focus groups take too long, cost too much, and one loud participant can distort the whole read on case value.
Solo or small-firm litigator preparing for trial can't afford CaseMap's per-seat licensing and doesn't want a desktop-only tool — but the only alternatives are generic case management platforms that treat timeline building as an afterthought, not the core workflow
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…