Case Management

#77 rlegaltech500

Opus 2

Updated 2026-02-10
cloudcollaboration
○ Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with Opus 2

Opus 2 is a litigation-focused case management and trial preparation platform for law firms handling complex disputes, arbitration, and regulatory proceedings. Core capabilities: AI-enabled case analysis (via acquired Uncover AI), case chronology building, transcript management (depositions and hearings), exhibit management with annotation, document review, trial presentation, and multi-stakeholder collaboration (lit support, associates, partners, co-counsel, clients). UK-headquartered, global footprint. PE-backed: Astorg Mid-Cap majority stake since March 2021. Acquired Amsterdam AI startup Uncover (Oct 2025) to accelerate AI in litigation and arbitration. 22,396 LinkedIn followers. LawNext Winter 2026 release incorporated Uncover AI into Opus 2 Cases within 3 months. G2 and Capterra listed. No public pricing — enterprise/custom model. Positioned for BigLaw, Am Law, and Magic Circle firms handling high-stakes litigation and international arbitration. Not a general practice management tool — purely litigation support and case strategy.

Capabilities

Spans 6 product areas: Case Management, Trial , Presentation, Depositions and Hearings, Litigation Management and Trial Preparation, Project Management and Collaboration.

Workflow Coverage

Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 6 workflow areas:

  • Document Review & Management — Document Management, Exhibit Management
  • Filing & Compliance — Timelines
  • Communication & Collaboration — Messaging
  • Client & Matter Lifecycle — Client Intake
  • Firm Operations & Growth — Task Management
  • Research & Analysis

Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.

Company Info

  • Sector: Legal Tech

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Workflows

Based on practitioner evidence, Opus 2 is used in these workflows:

Document Review & Management #26 of 188 Communication & Collaboration #25 of 114

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Opus 2 addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

500K documents to review, contract attorneys burning out after 4 hours of screen-staring, nobody knows if the review is consistent across 20 reviewers — and the partner watching the budget bleed

Document Review & Management 62 vendors affected Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200) · In-house counsel · Government

Medical records arrive as 500-2,000 page PDFs that a paralegal spends 8-20 hours manually reading and summarising into a chronology — the bottleneck that delays every PI demand

Document Review & Management 28 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Discovery responses in plaintiff cases are a time trap — interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission each require cross-referencing the entire case file, taking 10-20 hours per round

Document Review & Management 6 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Litigation team building a case chronology across 50,000 documents, 30 depositions, and hundreds of exhibits does it in Excel or Word — no single platform connects facts, people, events, and evidence into a searchable timeline, so critical connections between a witness statement and a document are missed

Document Review & Management 23 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50)

International arbitration team manages proceedings across London, Singapore, and New York with different procedural rules, time zones, and tribunal preferences — no single platform coordinates hearing bundles, real-time transcription, and virtual hearing rooms across jurisdictions

Communication & Collaboration 16 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · In-house counsel · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Government

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…