Fund workflow automation platform that digitizes subscription documents and investor onboarding for private funds. Products: Electronic Subscription Documents (20 min avg completion, 80%+ first-try accuracy), KYC/AML financial crime compliance, investor questionnaires with conditional logic, status monitoring. Integrations: Allvue Systems (Oct 2025), STP BluePrint (Jan 2026), Intapp DealCloud, Altvia, GPFS, Ontra. Goodwin law firm collaboration (‘Goodwin Embark’ product, May 2024). SOC 2 Type II certified, GDPR compliant. Has CISO (Justin Thomas). Founded 2020 by ex-Carta Investor Services team: Tim Flannery (CEO), Ben Doran (CPO), Alex Laplante. $15M total funding ($5M seed Feb 2022, $10M Series A Feb 2023 led by Positive Sum, Motley Fool Ventures). TechCrunch, Built in NYC, BusinessWire coverage. LegalTech Hub listed. VC Stack listed with reviews. NOTE: CEO Tim Flannery’s LinkedIn shows role ending Feb 2026, now Managing Director at iCapital — combined with iCapital’s acquisition of competitor Parallel Markets (Jan 2025), this may signal Passthrough acquisition by iCapital. SEC/FinCEN AML/CTF regulations (Aug 2024) expanded to include investment advisers — directly drives demand for Passthrough’s compliance product.
Company Info
- Founded: 2020
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $15M
- HQ: United States
- Sector: Governance/Compliance/Risk Management
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Passthrough is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Passthrough addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Private fund with 50 LPs each negotiating unique side letter provisions — tracking which investor got which concession across 200+ side letters is impossible manually. MFN clauses mean every new concession might trigger cascading rights for other LPs, and one missed obligation is a breach of fiduciary duty
Banking partner closing a $500M syndicated loan has 200+ conditions precedent tracked in a shared spreadsheet — counterparty counsel, borrower's team, and three syndicate members each maintain their own version, nobody knows in real-time which CPs are satisfied, and the paralegal spends an entire day before every status call manually reconciling five different trackers
Patent attorney drafting a 30-page specification has to manually verify that every reference label ('processor 235', 'memory 240', 'display 245') is used consistently across the specification, claims, and drawings — one mislabelled reference or antecedent basis error can trigger a USPTO objection that costs the client $2,000+ in additional prosecution fees and delays the application by months
In-house IP team at a tech company files 200+ patent applications per year and each one takes a patent agent 40-60 hours to draft from the inventor disclosure — the bottleneck isn't the invention, it's the labour-intensive process of writing specifications, claims, and figures that meet USPTO requirements, while the patent agent's queue grows faster than they can work through it
Litigation team preparing a patent invalidity defence needs to find prior art that anticipates or renders obvious each claim element — manually building claim charts across dozens of references takes weeks and costs $50-100K in associate time, and missing one key reference could lose the case
Patent prosecution attorney receives an office action and needs to decide whether to fight, amend, or appeal — but has no data on this specific examiner's grant rate, allowance patterns, or appeal success rate, so the strategy decision comes down to gut feel instead of evidence, and a wrong call burns through the client's prosecution budget on a losing strategy
When my litigation team receives 100,000 documents in discovery and the partner wants an early case assessment by Friday, I need to understand the key facts, players, and timeline before we've even started formal review — but right now the only option is throwing associate hours at it and hoping we surface the right documents
Small firm sends 50 engagement letters a month and each one requires manually creating the PDF, emailing it, waiting for the client to print-sign-scan-return, then following up twice — the whole process takes 3 days per client when it should take 3 minutes
County DA's office processes 8,000 cases per year with 12 attorneys and a legacy case management system from the early 2000s that can't share data with law enforcement's records system — every case requires manual re-entry of arrest data, incident reports are printed and re-scanned, and the office has no real-time visibility into which cases are approaching statutory deadlines
Corporate legal department manages 500+ matters across 30 outside firms but has no single source of truth — matter details live in email chains, budget approvals happen via PDF attachments, and when the GC asks 'how many active IP matters do we have in EMEA and what's the projected spend?' the answer takes a paralegal two days to compile from scattered spreadsheets
Fund formation partner closes a $200M fund with 40 LPs — each investor gets a 50-page subscription agreement that needs to be customized based on their entity type, tax status, and regulatory jurisdiction, and the paralegal spends 3 weeks chasing investors for correct signatures, missing pages, and illegible responses before the fund can actually close
Fund manager's compliance team needs to verify KYC/AML for every LP in a new fund — 40 investors across 12 jurisdictions, each with different beneficial ownership structures, and the 31 CFR deadline is approaching while half the investors haven't submitted their compliance documentation
When I'm closing a $200M fund with 40 investors across three closings, I need subscription documents returned correctly the first time — right now investors hand-write answers, skip required fields, and my associates spend 60 hours per closing chasing corrections and re-signatures
Fund counsel sends 60-page subscription documents to 50 LPs for a new fund close — half come back incomplete, a quarter have errors in beneficial ownership fields, and the associate spends weeks chasing corrections while the GP pressures to close on schedule
New FinCEN beneficial ownership rules (31 CFR) require fund managers to collect and verify investor identity information by 2026 — the compliance team is manually screening each LP against sanctions lists using spreadsheets and can't keep up with the pace of new fund closings
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Passthrough
Fund formation law firms (Goodwin, others) create the subscription agreement and legal structure. Passthrough is triggered when the fund is ready to accept LPs — the law firm or fund manager sends customized subscription workflows to each investor. Also serves emerging managers launching first funds.
After Passthrough
After investors complete subscription docs and KYC, structured data exports feed into fund admin systems (via API/sFTP), CRMs, and investor portals. Ontra integration handles post-close fund document management. Allvue integration connects to fundraising systems. Completed subscriptions enable fund closing. Returning investors (50K+ in system) complete subsequent investments faster.
Integrations & hand-offs
Law firm creates sub docs → Passthrough digitizes and distributes → Investors complete customized workflows → KYC/AML verification → Data export to fund admin (Allvue/eFront/Dynamo via API/sFTP) → Ontra for post-close → iCapital distribution network for wealth management channels
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…