Early-stage AI tool that automates patent-to-product feature mapping and prior art searches, aimed at IP attorneys, patent agents, and in-house patent counsel who currently spend weeks manually cross-referencing patent claims against technical specifications. The tool produces visual mappings of patent claims against product features, helping IP professionals quickly identify which claims cover which product aspects — useful for infringement analysis, licensing negotiations, and portfolio valuation. Founded 2022 in Bengaluru, India by Amrutha Moorthy. Won Salesforce ‘All About AI’ challenge (Dec 2025) specifically for bringing explainability to AI-driven IP analysis — a differentiator in a space where most tools produce opaque recommendations. OPC (One Person Company) structure, 2-10 employees, no funding raised. One referenced customer case study (MyWonder) via LinkedIn — no independent law firm adoption evidence.
Company Info
- Founded: 2022
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: United States
- Sector: IP
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Patenti Technology Solutions is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Patenti Technology Solutions addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Trademark clearance search costs $1,500-3,000 through an attorney and takes weeks — startups and small businesses either skip it (risking a cease-and-desist) or use free tools that miss common law marks and state registrations
IP law firm prosecution team handling 500+ active patent applications across USPTO, EPO, JPO, and CNIPA uses a different docketing system than the client's in-house team — deadlines get double-entered or missed in translation, office action responses are tracked in email threads, and neither side has real-time visibility into prosecution status
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…