PatentPlus AI (patentplus.ai) is a VC-backed startup based in New York offering AutoPat, an autonomous AI-powered patent search system. Takes an Invention Disclosure Form (IDF) or claim set as input and produces prior art search reports by searching 150M+ patent documents and 38M+ research papers (vendor-claimed figures, unverified). Founded in 2021 by Massyl Mallem (chemical engineer) and Jake Winter (CTO). Backed by Draper Associates. Related to The Patent Searcher brand (thepatentsearcher.com). Primarily targets patentability and novelty searches — invalidity search and FTO capabilities unverified. Differentiates from AI search competitors by claiming fully autonomous end-to-end process (IDF in, report out) without human intervention mid-search. Offers free patent search reports as trial. Presented at IP Service World 2025 and AI & IP Summit USA. 2-10 employees, ~389 LinkedIn followers. No independent reviews, practitioner feedback, or accuracy benchmarks found from any source.
Who It’s For
- Patent attorneys and agents conducting patentability, novelty, or prior art searches
- In-house IP teams seeking to reduce dependency on outside counsel for preliminary patentability assessments
- Startups and inventors seeking affordable prior art assessment before filing
Note: the startup stage and small team (2-10 employees) suggest a direct-contact sales process rather than self-service signup.
What We Haven’t Verified
- Pricing and cost structure — unknown whether per-search or subscription model
- No independent reviews on G2, Capterra, or any review platform
- No practitioner feedback found on Reddit or legal tech forums
- No published accuracy benchmarks or case studies — all performance claims are vendor-sourced
- No evidence of use in IPR proceedings or patent prosecution
- AI model architecture and training data undisclosed
- Non-English patent coverage (CJK languages) claimed but unverified
- No documented integrations with patent management systems (Anaqua, CPA Global, Dennemeyer)
- No security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) found — significant gap given inputs include pre-publication inventions and trade secrets
- Competes with XLSCOUT, PatSnap, Ambercite, SenseIP, Lightbringer, Google Patents
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, PatentPlus AI is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems PatentPlus AI addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Patent attorney conducting a prior art search for a client's invention spends 2-3 days manually searching USPTO, EPO, and non-patent literature databases — reading hundreds of abstracts, mapping claims to prior art references, and still worrying they missed something in a Chinese or Japanese patent that wasn't translated. The search costs the client $5,000-15,000 and the attorney still can't guarantee completeness
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…