Cloud-based SaaS platform for patent portfolio oversight, monetization, and compliance. Targets IP law firms, patent owners/corporations, and lenders using patents as collateral. Key claimed capabilities: continuous patent portfolio monitoring, defective title chain detection, Sarbanes-Oxley patent compliance, law firm effectiveness tracking, patent due diligence for transactions. Founded 2021 by Uzi Aloush (18+ years in patent monetization, previously SynPat, also founder of Innovation Access Initiative), based in San Francisco/Oakland. Appears to be a one-person operation (TheOrg shows no other employees, 3 LinkedIn followers). PATENTRACK trademark filed January 2021. Blog content demonstrates genuine domain expertise (defective title chains, prosecution-litigation gap, SOX compliance). Positioned as ‘executive-level web platform’ — targets C-suite/GC rather than operational patent staff. No named customers, case studies, or testimonials found — all client references are aspirational. No independent reviews. No pricing. No security documentation. No media coverage. Competitors: Liberty Labs, Inngot, Wiz Domain, Anaqua, CPA Global/Clarivate, PatSnap.
Company Info
- Founded: 2021
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Founder: Uzi Aloush (also founder, Innovation Access Initiative)
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. No independent reviews, pricing, or verified deployments found.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, PatenTrack is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems PatenTrack addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
In-house legal team spends $3M+ annually across 15 outside firms but has no visibility into whether the work is efficient — invoices arrive as PDF line items that nobody has time to review properly, rate increases get rubber-stamped, and the GC can't answer the board's question: 'why did legal spend increase 20% this year?'
IP law firm prosecution team handling 500+ active patent applications across USPTO, EPO, JPO, and CNIPA uses a different docketing system than the client's in-house team — deadlines get double-entered or missed in translation, office action responses are tracked in email threads, and neither side has real-time visibility into prosecution status
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…