Qase is a small Canadian legal tech startup (Vancouver, est. 2018, ~5 employees, $785K funding) operating a referral management and client intake platform for law firms and legal organizations. The platform routes client inquiries to appropriate lawyers based on practice area and availability, books consultations via integrated scheduling, and automates forwarding fee tracking and collection. Actively used by BC Legal Referral Service, Access Pro Bono, Pivot Legal Society, and law school legal clinics in British Columbia. Mentioned positively on r/legaladvicecanada for connecting clients with lawyers for free consultations. Primary use case is legal aid organizations and law society referral services rather than commercial law firm practice management. Not relevant to in-house legal departments or transactional/litigation-focused firms. Pricing model not publicly disclosed. No outcome metrics (referral volumes, conversion rates, fee recovery amounts) publicly available. IMPORTANT: qase.io is a completely different company (QA test management software) — do not conflate. Qase occupies a niche between legal marketplaces (Priori, LegalMatch) and firm-centric intake CRMs (Clio Grow, Lawmatics), with its closest competitor being Captorra for referral tracking. Its differentiator is the network model connecting legal aid organizations with practitioners rather than serving as a firm-owned intake tool.
Company Info
- Founded: 2018
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $785K
- HQ: Canada
- Sector: Referral Software
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Qase is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Qase addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
New client calls the office, receptionist takes notes on paper, conflict check takes 48 hours — by then the prospect hired the first attorney who picked up the phone
Client calls asking 'what's happening with my case?' — paralegal has to interrupt the attorney because matter status lives in someone's head, not a system
Referral tracking is a mess — PI firms owe percentages to referring attorneys but tracking who sent which case, what they're owed, and when to pay is manual and error-prone
Solo/small firm has no pipeline visibility — 30 leads came in this month from Google Ads, website forms, and Avvo, but nobody knows which ones got followed up on, which went cold, or how many actually signed retainers
Potential client fills out the website contact form at 10pm — nobody responds until 9am, and by then they've already called three other firms and hired the one that picked up. No automated instant reply, no drip sequence, no follow-up reminders
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…