Remote Legal is a remote deposition platform and court reporting service founded in 2020, based in the US. Spun out from a parent company with 40 years of court reporting experience. CEO Brandon Greenblatt. ~72 employees. Proprietary platform built on AWS Fargate offers real-time AI-generated transcripts synchronized with video, ExhibitEdge exhibit management, Witness-Exhibit DualView, and same-day transcript delivery. All-inclusive pricing (no hidden fees). Uses both AI technology and human court reporters. Facebook page shows active service in NYC area. Making Sense (tech partner) helped convert Remote Legal into a ‘full tech-enabled company.’ Reddit: former employee recommends it. ZoomInfo confirms ‘all-in-one remote deposition platform.‘
Company Info
- Founded: 2020
- Team size: 51-200 employees
- HQ: United States
- Sector: Litigation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Remote Legal is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Remote Legal addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Mid-size law firm has used the same desktop billing software for 15 years and it works, but remote attorneys can't access it from home, new hires expect a browser-based interface, and the managing partner is worried about the vendor sunsetting the product — the switching cost feels enormous because 15 years of billing history and custom templates live in that local database
Every new legal tech tool means another vendor login, another security review, another budget line — the in-house team just wants something that works within the Microsoft stack they already have without adding procurement complexity
General counsel needs outside counsel for a niche matter — employment dispute in Singapore, regulatory filing in Brazil, or patent prosecution in Germany — but their existing panel doesn't cover it, and cold-calling firms from a directory is a crapshoot
Litigation team needs text messages from a custodian's phone for discovery but the custodian is in another city — shipping the phone takes a week, the custodian can't work without it, and the deadline is in 5 days
Litigation attorney takes a 4-hour deposition on Tuesday but the transcript won't arrive for 10-15 business days — by then the details are fuzzy, the next witness prep is rushed, and opposing counsel has already moved to exclude the testimony on a technicality the attorney can't remember clearly enough to rebut
During a remote deposition the witness is looking at Exhibit 14 but the attorney can't see both the witness's face and the exhibit at the same time — toggling between video feeds and document shares means missing the witness's reaction when confronted with a damaging document
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Remote Legal
Litigation attorney schedules deposition → books court reporter → coordinates witness, opposing counsel, videographer → needs a platform to conduct remote deposition.
After Remote Legal
Remote Legal handles the deposition (video, exhibits, AI transcription, court reporter) → delivers same-day transcript → attorney reviews for case strategy → transcript used in motions, trial prep, and settlement negotiations.
Integrations & hand-offs
Case management (Clio/Litify) → Scheduling → Remote Legal (deposition platform) → Transcript delivery → Case management → Trial prep / eDiscovery review platform.
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…