General-purpose online appointment scheduling platform with a dedicated legal vertical — not legal-specific software, but a horizontal scheduling tool with legal-focused marketing and integrations. Founded 2011 in Portland, OR. Bootstrapped, $3.2M revenue, 27-person team (GetLatka 2024). Free plan supports up to 4 users and 200 appointments/month; Pro plan $5/user/month. Capterra: 4.6/5 with 958 reviews — noted as ‘pretty basic install and setup.’ Legal-specific integrations: LawPay (payment processing, allows collecting consultation fees at booking) and LEX Reception (legal answering service that books into Setmore). Real-world usage confirmed at small legal clinics and solo practices (All For The Family Legal Clinic, Robinson Advocacy Group). Attorney at Law Magazine (2020) lists it among scheduling tools for law firms. Lawyerist (2023) covered the LEX + Setmore + LawPay tech stack. CozyCal (2025) notes ‘fewer customization options than premium alternatives, particularly regarding intake forms.’ Key differentiator vs. Calendly/Acuity for law firms is the pre-built LawPay integration and LEX Reception answering-to-scheduling handoff. Most applicable to solo and small firms (1-5 attorneys) handling initial client consultations. Mid-size and large firms would typically use their PM tool’s built-in scheduling. For companies already using Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, built-in scheduling tools may make Setmore redundant.
Capabilities
Spans 1 product area: Time and Billing.
Workflow Coverage
Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 2 workflow areas:
- Billing, Time & Finance — Time Tracking, Invoicing Tools, Trust Accounting, Automatic Time Capture (+4 more)
- Research & Analysis — Insights and Analytics
Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Setmore is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Setmore addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
New client calls the office, receptionist takes notes on paper, conflict check takes 48 hours — by then the prospect hired the first attorney who picked up the phone
Client calls asking 'what's happening with my case?' — paralegal has to interrupt the attorney because matter status lives in someone's head, not a system
Solo attorney paying $500+/month across 6 different software tools that don't share data — needs one system that actually handles the basics without nickel-and-diming
Solo/small firm has no pipeline visibility — 30 leads came in this month from Google Ads, website forms, and Avvo, but nobody knows which ones got followed up on, which went cold, or how many actually signed retainers
Potential client fills out the website contact form at 10pm — nobody responds until 9am, and by then they've already called three other firms and hired the one that picked up. No automated instant reply, no drip sequence, no follow-up reminders
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…