Solve Intelligence is a London-based AI patent drafting and prosecution platform used by patent attorneys, agents, and in-house IP teams. Public evidence is materially stronger than the stub suggests: Reddit threads in r/patentlaw and r/Patents discuss real-world use, G2 shows a 4.9-star seller profile with 17 verified reviews, and late-2025 coverage indicates the company raised a $40M Series B after a 2025 Series A, taking total funding to roughly $55M. The product focus is patent-specific rather than general legal AI: invention harvesting, patent application drafting, office action response drafting, and claim-charting. The strongest workflow fit is for high-volume patent prosecution teams trying to cut drafting time while keeping spec/claim quality under control.
Company Info
- Founded: 2023
- Funding: $15M
- HQ: United Kingdom
- Sector: IP
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Solveintelligence is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Solveintelligence addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Patent attorney drafting a 30-page specification has to manually verify that every reference label ('processor 235', 'memory 240', 'display 245') is used consistently across the specification, claims, and drawings — one mislabelled reference or antecedent basis error can trigger a USPTO objection that costs the client $2,000+ in additional prosecution fees and delays the application by months
In-house IP team at a tech company files 200+ patent applications per year and each one takes a patent agent 40-60 hours to draft from the inventor disclosure — the bottleneck isn't the invention, it's the labour-intensive process of writing specifications, claims, and figures that meet USPTO requirements, while the patent agent's queue grows faster than they can work through it
R&D team submits invention disclosures into a black box — they never hear back about patent decisions, don't understand why some inventions get filed and others don't, and eventually stop submitting because the process feels pointless
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Solveintelligence
Inventor or R&D team submits technical disclosure and the patent team decides whether to harvest it into a patent application.Patent attorney receives a new drafting or prosecution assignment and wants a faster first draft without giving up technical precision.
After Solveintelligence
Drafted application moves to attorney review, filing preparation, and office-action prosecution.Claim-charting and prosecution work flow into broader portfolio management or litigation analysis handled in other systems.
Integrations & hand-offs
Inventor / R&D team -> Solve Intelligence invention harvesting -> patent attorney / agent review.Solve drafting output -> human patent professional review -> patent office filing workflow.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…