StructureFlow (UK) is an AI-powered visual modelling platform that turns complex legal and financial data into structure charts, step plans, process maps, and timelines. Used by transactional lawyers to communicate deal structures visually.
Company Info
- Founded: 2018
- Team size: 11-50 employees
- Funding: $9.6M
- HQ: United Kingdom
- Sector: In-House Automation, Corporate
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Structureflow is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Structureflow addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
PE fund acquires portfolio company and needs clean org charts, entity registers, and compliance status for exit due diligence — but entity data is scattered across spreadsheets, minute books, and outside counsel files, director lists are stale, and filing compliance status across 15 jurisdictions is uncertain, slowing the deal by weeks
Banking partner closing a $500M syndicated loan has 200+ conditions precedent tracked in a shared spreadsheet — counterparty counsel, borrower's team, and three syndicate members each maintain their own version, nobody knows in real-time which CPs are satisfied, and the paralegal spends an entire day before every status call manually reconciling five different trackers
Corporate associate managing M&A due diligence needs to share 2,000 documents with the buyer's counsel in a structured data room — but the firm's general-purpose file sharing (SharePoint, Dropbox) has no granular permission controls, no audit trail of who viewed what, and no way to revoke access after the deal closes or falls through
Corporate secretary or GC prepares board materials by copying slides into a 60-page PDF board book, manually taking minutes during the meeting, then chasing directors for votes and signature approvals via email after — the entire governance cycle from prep to minutes approval takes 2-3 weeks, and when regulators or auditors ask for governance documentation it's scattered across email, SharePoint, and filing cabinets
When I'm closing a $200M fund with 40 investors across three closings, I need subscription documents returned correctly the first time — right now investors hand-write answers, skip required fields, and my associates spend 60 hours per closing chasing corrections and re-signatures
Corporate partner explaining a multi-jurisdictional restructuring to the client's board — draws boxes on a whiteboard, takes a photo, emails it to the team, then the associate recreates it in PowerPoint with slightly different entity names, and when the structure changes three days later the whole cycle starts again because nobody has a single source of truth for what the group structure actually looks like right now
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…