Unicourt

Documents scattered across email, shared drives, attorney desktops, and filing cabinets — paralegal can't find the key document when it's needed for court or a deposition

PACER's interface is a 1990s relic — every lookup costs per page, search is primitive, there's no alert system, and downloading bulk docket entries means clicking through dozens of screens while tracking $0.10/page charges across 50 active cases

Litigation team monitors 200+ active federal cases and needs instant alerts when opposing counsel files a motion, a judge issues an order, or a deadline shifts — but PACER has no native notification system, so paralegals manually check dockets daily

Patent litigation partner needs to know judge X's claim construction tendencies, opposing counsel's win rate on summary judgment motions, and which damages experts the other side typically retains — but this intelligence is locked in individual attorneys' heads and scattered across firm matter files

Patent case outcomes depend heavily on the assigned judge and PTAB panel — but there's no systematic way to analyze how a specific judge has ruled on Alice/Section 101 motions, Markman hearings, or damages calculations without manually reading hundreds of orders

Litigation firm needs to build custom analytics dashboards — track motion success rates by judge, venue, and case type across state and federal courts — but existing tools offer pre-built reports that don't match their specific strategic questions

Litigation team preparing for trial needs to understand how a specific judge rules on summary judgment motions, Daubert challenges, and sentencing — but there's no systematic analytics on judge behavior, so strategy relies on anecdotes from colleagues who've appeared before that judge

Litigation partner preparing a pitch to a prospective client wants to show the firm's track record in commercial disputes in the Southern District but has no way to pull that data — win rates, judge tendencies, opposing counsel history are all locked in PACER and individual attorney memories

Litigation partner preparing for a patent trial in the Eastern District of Texas wants to know this judge's median time-to-ruling, summary judgment grant rate, and how opposing counsel has performed in similar cases — but this data is scattered across thousands of PACER docket entries with no way to aggregate or compare.

Partner discovers at 4pm that a motion to dismiss was filed against their client two days ago — the ECF notification email was buried in the paralegal's inbox under 200 other emails, and nobody noticed until opposing counsel called asking about the response deadline