Practice Management
Yarris
In-house legal matter management platform built by Yarris Technologies (Melbourne, Australia, founded 1995). Flagship product Dazychain (rebranding to IntuityAI per CCBJ report) provides end-to-end matter management for corporate legal departments: intake from business units (‘legal front door’), triage, document management, reporting, external panel management, collaboration, knowledge management, risk, and contract management. IntuityAI layer adds AI capabilities (announced Oct 2025). Bootstrapped, $1.8M revenue, ~16-person team (GetLatka 2025). Capterra: 4.8/5 with 16 reviews, starting at $200/month — significantly below enterprise ELM platforms. SoftwareFinder review praises ‘smooth onboarding with patient training.’ College of Law Australia demo (2021) described it as ‘cloud-based, intuitive, and quick to learn and implement.’ AWS infrastructure (Shield, Inspector, CloudFront, Cognito SSO/SAML). Security architecture PDF published May 2025. No SOC 2 certification mentioned. Targets small-to-mid in-house legal departments (2-20 lawyers). For right-sized teams, the $200/mo price point and reported ease of onboarding makes it a credible alternative to DIY Notion/spreadsheet setups. CCBJ (Mar 2026) published Katherine King article on matter management. G2 categorizes alongside Filevine, Litify, Brightflag, Legal Tracker, Mitratech. Occupies the affordable end of in-house matter management, competing with Xakia and LawVu for smaller teams. No named customer case studies. No Reddit mentions.
Company Info
- Founded: 2011
- Team size: 11-50 employees
- Funding: $100K
- HQ: Australia
- Sector: In-House Automation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Yarris is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Yarris addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Sales sends contract requests via Slack, email, and hallway conversations — legal has no queue, no triage, and no idea how many requests are pending
Client calls asking 'what's happening with my case?' — paralegal has to interrupt the attorney because matter status lives in someone's head, not a system
Documents scattered across email, shared drives, attorney desktops, and filing cabinets — paralegal can't find the key document when it's needed for court or a deposition
Firm uses separate tools for intake, documents, billing, and e-signatures that don't talk to each other — opening a new matter means entering the same client info 4 times across systems that should but don't share data
In-house legal team spends $3M+ annually across 15 outside firms but has no visibility into whether the work is efficient — invoices arrive as PDF line items that nobody has time to review properly, rate increases get rubber-stamped, and the GC can't answer the board's question: 'why did legal spend increase 20% this year?'
Corporate legal department manages 500+ matters across 30 outside firms but has no single source of truth — matter details live in email chains, budget approvals happen via PDF attachments, and when the GC asks 'how many active IP matters do we have in EMEA and what's the projected spend?' the answer takes a paralegal two days to compile from scattered spreadsheets
Corporate legal department outsources contract review, compliance work, and litigation support to 5+ ALSPs and law firms — but the GC has no single view of what all these external resources are actually delivering, whether quality is consistent across providers, or how to compare value between a $500/hr law firm associate and a $200/hr ALSP contract analyst doing similar work
Where it fits in your workflow
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…