Altorney is a dual-product legal technology company: (1) Altorney Marketplace — a self-service platform for sourcing and managing document review attorneys, and (2) MARC — a GenAI-powered first-pass review engine that runs behind the corporate firewall. Founded 2021. ~9 employees, 1,319 LinkedIn followers, EV=320. Marketplace: dual-sided platform connecting law firms/ALSPs/corporate legal departments with vetted document reviewers. Skill matching, real-time project tracking, automated billing, compliance monitoring. Replaces traditional staffing agencies with transparent, self-service model. MARC: ‘first GenAI-powered solution to deliver document review classification entirely within your secure cloud environment’ — data never leaves corporate environment. Automates tagging, culling, and explaining document decisions for first-pass review. Fortune 500 case study: 200,000-document case, 62% review cost savings. Lineal partnership: expanded document review operations with automated sourcing and real-time insights, 65% efficiency improvement (LinkedIn). LawNext/Bob Ambrogi exclusive on MARC general availability (Oct 2025). Listed on r/ReviewAttorneys as document review vendor alongside Consilio, Epiq. Legalweek 2026 attendee. No pricing published. Competitors: Consilio, Epiq, Diamond Personnel, Cadence Counsel (staffing); Relativity, Everlaw (AI review). Key differentiator: MARC runs behind the firewall — for enterprises where data cannot leave the corporate cloud. Marketplace replaces opaque staffing agencies with transparent, self-service sourcing. Combination of human reviewer sourcing + AI first-pass review in one platform.
Company Info
- Founded: 2021
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: United States
- Sector: ALSPLitigation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Altorney is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Altorney addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Litigation team building a case chronology across 50,000 documents, 30 depositions, and hundreds of exhibits does it in Excel or Word — no single platform connects facts, people, events, and evidence into a searchable timeline, so critical connections between a witness statement and a document are missed
AmLaw 200 firm needs 15 contract attorneys for a 6-month document review project but the staffing agency takes a 40% markup, the reviewers' quality is inconsistent, and the firm has no visibility into who's available, what they cost, or how they performed on past projects
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Altorney
Corporate legal or law firm receives document production → needs to staff document review project → traditionally contacts staffing agencies for contract attorneys → now uses Altorney marketplace to self-serve source reviewers → MARC runs AI first-pass before human review begins.
After Altorney
After first-pass review (MARC) → human reviewers handle remaining documents → reviewed documents feed into case strategy, privilege log, and production decisions → billing and time tracking managed within Altorney platform.
Integrations & hand-offs
Altorney (reviewer sourcing + AI first-pass) → Relativity/Everlaw (review platform where documents live); → law firm case management (strategy from review findings); → corporate legal department (in-house investigations, compliance reviews). MARC integrates within client's existing cloud infrastructure.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…