Case Management

#163 rlegaltech500

Case Anywhere Llc

Est. 2006 United States Updated 2026-02-10
Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with Case Anywhere Llc

Case Anywhere (caseanywhere.com) is a cloud-based case management, e-service, and collaboration platform for litigation and arbitration professionals — specifically for complex multi-party proceedings, not general day-to-day law firm case management. Founded 2006, Los Angeles. Acquired by Counsel Press (largest US appellate services provider) in December 2024, creating a trial-to-appellate case management pipeline. Five hub types: Litigation Hubs, Arbitration Hubs, Collaboration Hubs, Administrative Proceeding Hubs, and Transactional E-Filing/E-Service. Court-ordered deployment in high-profile MDL cases: Risperdal/Invega Product Liability, Watts Regulator, Toyota Motor Unintended Acceleration, CRT Antitrust Litigation, BP Solar Settlement. Core functions: document e-filing and e-service, case record hosting, event calendaring, secure messaging between parties/courts/arbitrators, and private label options. Arbitration hubs operational since 2012 for ad hoc/non-administered proceedings. California court e-filing at $13/filing (self-service) + 3.5% credit card processing fee. MDL matter pricing is significantly higher (~$8K+ per matter per court filing). Hosted on Microsoft Azure with 24/7 Azure Security Technology monitoring, follows NIST cybersecurity guidelines — but no SOC 2 certification documented. ~10 employees pre-acquisition. 132 LinkedIn followers. ACP (Counsel Press parent) pursuing further M&A. Keyword ‘case anywhere’ (2,400/mo) is heavily conflated with the generic phrase — actual branded search volume near zero.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2006
  • Team size: 1-10 employees
  • Funding: $100K
  • HQ: United States

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Case Anywhere Llc addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

Court filing is a logistics nightmare — every jurisdiction has different rules (e-filing vs paper, specific cover sheets, local requirements), deadlines are non-negotiable, and small firms can't afford a full-time filing runner or courthouse messenger

Filing & Compliance 17 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

International arbitration team manages proceedings across London, Singapore, and New York with different procedural rules, time zones, and tribunal preferences — no single platform coordinates hearing bundles, real-time transcription, and virtual hearing rooms across jurisdictions

Communication & Collaboration 16 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · In-house counsel · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Government

Arbitration hearing runs 8 hours with witnesses speaking in accented English across three time zones — the traditional court reporter charges $5,000/day and the transcript arrives 48 hours later with terminology errors that counsel has to fix before it's usable for post-hearing briefs

Communication & Collaboration 15 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Small firm (2–10) · Government

MDL or mass tort coordinating counsel needs to manage document exchange among 40+ plaintiff firms, defense counsel, and the transferee court — filings need to reach all parties simultaneously, the court wants a single organized case file, and the Special Master is demanding a reliable system for tracking what was served to whom and when, but email chains with 200 attorneys are unmanageable and PACER alone does not handle the volume of inter-party communications

Communication & Collaboration 15 vendors affected BigLaw (200+) · litigation-partner · Paralegal

High-conflict custody case generates hundreds of text messages, emails, and voicemails between co-parents — the family law attorney needs to find the three messages that prove a pattern of interference, but they're scattered across platforms and the client's phone screenshots are inadmissible hearsay

Communication & Collaboration 16 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · associate

Board meeting prep is a quarterly fire drill — the corporate secretary scrambles to assemble board books from 6 different sources, track director consents across time zones, maintain minutes archives, and ensure governance resolutions are properly filed, all while the GC changes the agenda 48 hours before the meeting.

Communication & Collaboration 23 vendors affected GC · corporate-secretary · chief-of-staff · in-house-counsel

Patent attorney conducting a prior art search for a client's invention spends 2-3 days manually searching USPTO, EPO, and non-patent literature databases — reading hundreds of abstracts, mapping claims to prior art references, and still worrying they missed something in a Chinese or Japanese patent that wasn't translated. The search costs the client $5,000-15,000 and the attorney still can't guarantee completeness

Research & Analysis 34 vendors affected ip-attorney · patent-agent · patent-attorney · associate

General counsel needs outside counsel for a niche matter — employment dispute in Singapore, regulatory filing in Brazil, or patent prosecution in Germany — but their existing panel doesn't cover it, and cold-calling firms from a directory is a crapshoot

Client & Matter Lifecycle 11 vendors affected in-house-counsel · legal-ops · small-firm-partner · various

Liaison counsel appointed to a mass tort MDL with 700+ individual plaintiffs needs a central platform where all parties — plaintiff steering committee, defense counsel, the court — can e-serve documents, access shared records, and track deadlines, but existing court ECF systems weren't built for this scale of multi-party coordination

Client & Matter Lifecycle 3 vendors affected Paralegal · legal-ops · BigLaw (200+) · large-firm

We have 70 firms on this MDL and nobody can find the right filing or figure out what's been served — the email chain for case coordination is a disaster

Document Review & Management 2 vendors affected mid-firm · large-firm · Paralegal

Where it fits in your workflow

Before Case Anywhere Llc

Court appoints liaison counsel for MDL → need centralised platform for e-service across 30+ participating firms → Case Anywhere sets up litigation hub. Or: arbitration panel convenes → Case Anywhere provides arbitration hub for document filing and communication.

After Case Anywhere Llc

Case Anywhere hub (e-service/document hosting/calendaring) → participating attorneys file and access documents → court/tribunal receives filings → case progresses. E-filing component submits to courts electronically.

Integrations & hand-offs

Case Anywhere (multi-party collaboration) → court CM/ECF systems (e-filing) → individual firm DMS (document storage). Platform is the shared layer between multiple firms working on the same case.

Also used by similar teams

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…