Case Management

#343 rlegaltech500

Casefleet

Est. 2015 United States Updated 2026-02-10
Unverified by r/legaltech members — this page is based on publicly available information, not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback. Verify your experience with Casefleet

CaseFleet is an AI-powered litigation case management tool focused on fact chronologies, document review, and trial preparation. Founded 2015 in Atlanta, GA by Jeff Kerr (former litigator, sole founder, CEO). Core product builds structured fact timelines linking documents, witnesses, dates, and issues into a searchable chronology. Two AI capabilities: (1) ‘Suggested Facts’ (launched June 12, 2025) — auto-extracts factual statements from pleadings, transcripts, records and proposes chronology entries; (2) ‘Document Intelligence’ — summarizes documents and extracts key entities (people, organizations, dates, locations, events). Also includes deposition transcript reviewer, exhibit management, Bates numbering, and visual timelines. Positioned as modern CaseMap alternative — cloud-native, easier setup, integrated document review. Dedicated use-case pages for solo practitioners (‘perfect for solo lawyers’) and personal injury firms. Very small team (2-10 employees per TLTF, 4 per stub). No external funding found — appears bootstrapped. HQ: 675 Ponce De Leon Ave NE, Suite 8500, Atlanta, GA. Capterra: listed with reviews (‘easily the best program I have found to manage evidence’). G2: listed. Software Advice: listed. Reddit: mentioned in r/Lawyertalk, r/paralegal, r/LawCanada as CaseMap alternative. Above the Law podcast appearance (2018). ABA TechShow exhibitor (2017+). Security: 2FA, encryption, strong passwords — but no SOC 2. Pricing: Starter $40/user/mo, Standard/Advanced AI $100/user/mo + $10/GB/mo storage. EV: 590/mo. 426 LinkedIn followers.

Capabilities

Spans 7 product areas: Case Management, Electronic Discovery, Document Management, Document , Review and , Analysis, Litigation Management and Trial Preparation.

Workflow Coverage

Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 5 workflow areas:

  • Document Review & Management — Document Management, Document Database Management (Repository for Archiving and Retention), Document Disposition Based on User Defined Rules, Version Control (+8 more)
  • Filing & Compliance — Access Controls, Encryption capabilities, Data Loss and Malware Prevention, Data Recovery (+3 more)
  • Client & Matter Lifecycle — Client Intake
  • Research & Analysis — Early Case Assessment
  • Communication & Collaboration — Integration with Microsoft Teams

Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2015
  • Team size: 1-10 employees
  • HQ: United States
  • Sector: Case Management

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

What practitioners struggle with

Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Casefleet addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.

Medical records arrive as 500-2,000 page PDFs that a paralegal spends 8-20 hours manually reading and summarising into a chronology — the bottleneck that delays every PI demand

Document Review & Management 28 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

Litigation team building a case chronology across 50,000 documents, 30 depositions, and hundreds of exhibits does it in Excel or Word — no single platform connects facts, people, events, and evidence into a searchable timeline, so critical connections between a witness statement and a document are missed

Document Review & Management 23 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50)

Litigation attorney drafting a motion for summary judgment needs to link every factual assertion to the specific page in the deposition transcript or exhibit that supports it — manually cross-referencing 3,000 pages of discovery against 30 pages of brief takes two full days, and a single unsupported factual statement gives opposing counsel ammunition to strike

Document Drafting & Automation 11 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Large firm (51–200)

When my litigation team receives 100,000 documents in discovery and the partner wants an early case assessment by Friday, I need to understand the key facts, players, and timeline before we've even started formal review — but right now the only option is throwing associate hours at it and hoping we surface the right documents

Research & Analysis 37 vendors affected senior-associate · litigation-partner · legal-ops · partner

Criminal defense attorney gets 34,000 pages of discovery from the prosecution — body cam footage, phone records, texts, witness statements, police reports — and has 60 days to find the needle in the haystack that proves their client's innocence. Manual review would take weeks they don't have, and the critical exculpatory detail is buried on page 28,347

Document Review & Management 10 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50) · Government

Defense team is preparing for trial in 3 weeks and needs to build a coherent timeline from fragmented evidence — witness statements contradict each other, body cam timestamps don't align, and critical connections between defendants are buried across thousands of documents

Research & Analysis 9 vendors affected Solo practitioner · Small firm (2–10) · Mid-size firm (11–50)

Litigator preparing for cross-examination has 30 depositions and 200 exhibits spread across separate PDFs — toggling between documents in Adobe Acrobat or printing everything to paper, losing the connection between what a witness said on page 47 and the exhibit that contradicts it

Document Review & Management 16 vendors affected Solo practitioner · small-firm · mid-firm · Small firm (2–10)

Senior partner preparing for cross-examination of a key witness in a multi-billion-dollar commercial dispute knows the witness's deposition testimony contradicts three earlier board meeting minutes — but finding those specific inconsistencies across 200,000 documents took a team of associates 6 weeks, and the partner suspects there are more contradictions buried in the record that nobody found

Research & Analysis 6 vendors affected Large firm (51–200) · BigLaw (200+) · Mid-size firm (11–50)

Litigation paralegal gets a 500-page case file and needs to build a chronology for trial prep — reading every document, extracting dates and facts, and organizing them into a timeline takes 3 days of manual work that could be spent on actual case strategy

Document Review & Management 8 vendors affected junior-assoc · Paralegal · senior-assoc · Small firm (2–10)

Litigator has 200 pages of deposition transcripts and needs to extract the 15 key facts that matter for the motion — but reading and manually tagging each relevant passage takes an entire weekend, and there's no way to link those facts back to the specific transcript page when writing the brief

Research & Analysis 21 vendors affected Solo practitioner · small-firm · mid-firm · junior-associate

Solo or small-firm litigator preparing for trial can't afford CaseMap's per-seat licensing and doesn't want a desktop-only tool — but the only alternatives are generic case management platforms that treat timeline building as an afterthought, not the core workflow

Document Review & Management 4 vendors affected Solo practitioner · small-firm

Where it fits in your workflow

Before Casefleet

Case opened → documents collected (discovery, subpoenas, records requests) → uploaded to CaseFleet → AI Document Intelligence extracts facts and entities → Suggested Facts proposes chronology entries → paralegal/attorney reviews and builds chronology

After Casefleet

Chronology → deposition preparation (transcript reviewer) → trial preparation → exhibit management → cross-examination outlines → trial presentation (separate tools like TrialPad, Sanction)

Integrations & hand-offs

CaseFleet sits between document collection/discovery (upstream — eDiscovery tools like Relativity, Logikcull) and trial presentation (downstream — TrialPad, Sanction). Core is the middle layer: taking raw documents and building the factual narrative. Deposition transcript review is a pre-trial workflow. No direct integrations with eDiscovery or trial presentation tools documented — this is a gap.

Also used by similar teams

Community Data

Loading practitioner-sourced data…