Delium is a cloud-based evidence management and eTrial platform for litigators and courts, supporting review, analysis, and presentation of evidence at trial or arbitration. Founded 2016 in Australia. ~13 employees, 361 LinkedIn followers, EV=0 (corrected from 480 — all searches were for Delium Tires, a different company). Two products: Pre-Trial (case analysis and preparation) and eTrial (electronic evidence presentation in hearing rooms). Claims to be ‘the only evidence management software to personalise the presentation of evidence at trial’ with patented presentation functionality. Record Activity Module for trial and arbitration recordkeeping compliance. Key case studies: 80% cost reduction for a major case, 500 elderly plaintiffs government litigation managed seamlessly, sole practitioner scaling case. Security upheld in court: when a party challenged Delium’s security in a divorce case, the court ruled Delium’s protections were adequate. Partnership with elaw.com.au — Delium is the underlying technology for elaw’s eLitigation services in Australia. dtSearch integration for full-text search. Law Institute of Victoria Technophile article covered Delium’s eDiscovery capabilities. Listed on Legaltech Hub and Theorem Legal Marketplace. No G2/Capterra reviews. No Reddit presence. Pricing not published. Australian market primary but arbitration cases extend internationally. Competitors: Opus 2, CaseLines (UK), TrialDirector, eTrialToolkit. Key differentiator: personalised evidence presentation per participant role (judge, barrister, solicitor, witness each see adapted views) with patented technology. Covers full litigation cycle from pre-trial analysis through hearing presentation to post-hearing recordkeeping.
Company Info
- Founded: 2016
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: Australia
- Sector: Litigation, Case Management
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Delium is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Delium addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Litigation team building a case chronology across 50,000 documents, 30 depositions, and hundreds of exhibits does it in Excel or Word — no single platform connects facts, people, events, and evidence into a searchable timeline, so critical connections between a witness statement and a document are missed
Arbitrator managing a 3-week commercial hearing with 200 exhibits needs to present evidence electronically but the hearing room has no eTrial setup — counsel are passing USB drives, projecting PDFs manually, and nobody can quickly pull up Exhibit 147 when it's referenced in cross-examination
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Delium
Litigation team prepares for trial/arbitration → evidence needs to be organised, analysed, and prepared for presentation → documents loaded into Delium for pre-trial analysis → hearing room configured for electronic presentation.
After Delium
After hearing → Record Activity Module captures hearing record → evidence retained per compliance requirements → post-hearing review and appeal preparation. Evidence presentation outputs feed into judgment/award processes.
Integrations & hand-offs
Delium (evidence management) → eDiscovery platforms (document source); → court/tribunal hearing rooms (presentation destination); → elaw.com.au (partner eLitigation service); → dtSearch (full-text search integration). Court administrators configure hearing room environment.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…