FrandAvenue is a niche SEP/FRAND platform aimed at patent licensors, implementers, IP consultancies, and patent attorneys working on standard-essential patent licensing. The product bundles a 650,000+ SEP database, augmented 3GPP data, claim-chart marketplace, portfolio and licensing-program management, analytics, and a negotiation room for controlled document exchange. Public pricing is unusually transparent for this part of the IP market: Copper starts at EUR600/month billed annually, Silver at EUR1,200/month, Gold at EUR3,000/month, Platinum at EUR5,000/month, and an Expert plan for law firms/IP consultants is EUR500/month. The company was founded in 2020 in France and lists roughly 1,700 LinkedIn followers. The founder, Cyrille Amar, is an IP lawyer with visible FRAND credentials and appears in IAM Strategy 300 rankings, but independent practitioner validation is thin: no Reddit signal, no G2/Capterra review footprint, and most workflow evidence comes from FrandAvenue’s own site, LinkedIn posts, and YouTube explainers. This looks like a real legal/IP workflow tool, but verification confidence is limited because the market is narrow and third-party usage evidence is sparse.
Company Info
- Founded: 2020
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- HQ: France
- Sector: Gen, AIIP
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Frandavenue is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Frandavenue addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
In-house IP team asked to evaluate whether a new product infringes competitor patents — evidence-of-use analysis requires manually comparing product features against hundreds of patent claims, which takes weeks of attorney time at $500/hour and still produces incomplete results
SEP licensor and implementer finally agree to negotiate, but the actual FRAND process still runs through scattered emails, ad hoc NDAs, claim-chart attachments, and 'who sent what when' arguments — months disappear before anyone is discussing rate or scope, and each side starts accusing the other of hold-up or hold-out because there is no shared, auditable negotiation workspace.
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Frandavenue
SEP owner or implementer needs to assess a wireless/IoT portfolio before a FRAND negotiation starts: which declared patents matter, which claim charts already exist, what products or standards are implicated, and who should see what information under NDA.
After Frandavenue
After the initial analysis, outside counsel, licensing teams, and technical experts use the claim-chart and negotiation materials to decide whether to send or answer a licensing approach, continue bilateral negotiation, escalate to expert support, or prepare for SEP litigation/arbitration.
Integrations & hand-offs
FrandAvenue database and claim-chart marketplace -> internal IP/licensing team -> outside patent counsel or SEP consultants -> negotiation room/document exchange -> draft licensing terms and expert analyses. No public integrations with mainstream DMS, e-billing, or legal research systems were found.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…