AI-powered criminal defense platform that analyzes case evidence — audio, video, body cam footage, witness statements, emails, texts — and automates document categorization, entity recognition, timeline building, and trial preparation. Founded by Jared White (CEO). $7.5M seed round led by Timespan Ventures with TIAA Ventures participating. Purpose-built for criminal defense, not adapted from civil eDiscovery — the key differentiator in a market where most tools assume civil litigation workflows. Exclusive AI partner of South Carolina Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (SCACDL). Only named customer: Manley & Manley (condensed 34,000 pages to 10 pages of relevant content). Claims $40K+ cost savings per case by eliminating per-GB hosting fees (vendor-claimed, not independently verified). UC Berkeley Law lists it as a recommended criminal defense AI tool. Reddit practitioners praise affordability and workflow fit for both attorneys and paralegals. FAQ claims ISO 27001 and end-to-end encryption but no SOC 2 Type II or CJIS compliance documented. Expanding to PI and corporate investigations but evidence is limited. Criminal defense is genuinely underserved by legal tech — Matey appears to be the only dedicated platform in this niche.
Company Info
- Founded: 2022
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $8M
- HQ: Canada
- Sector: Litigation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Matey is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Matey addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
eDiscovery costs are insane — traditional vendors charge per-GB processing fees that can hit $100K+ for a single matter, making it economically impossible for small-to-mid firms to run proper discovery
eDiscovery tools require a dedicated specialist to operate — Relativity needs an admin, but most small/mid litigation teams don't have one and need something a paralegal can use after a 30-minute demo
Litigation team building a case chronology across 50,000 documents, 30 depositions, and hundreds of exhibits does it in Excel or Word — no single platform connects facts, people, events, and evidence into a searchable timeline, so critical connections between a witness statement and a document are missed
Senior partner spends 3 hours line-editing a junior associate's 30-page brief — fixing passive voice, nominalizations, throat-clearing introductions, and inconsistent tone — because the firm has no systematic way to enforce writing standards before work reaches partner review, and every associate makes the same mistakes
Solo or small firm attorney pays $25-50/month per user for DocuSign or Adobe Sign just to get engagement letters and retainer agreements signed — the firm sends maybe 15 documents a month and doesn't need enterprise features, but there's no middle ground between free tools with no audit trail and expensive enterprise platforms
Patent attorney drafting a 30-page specification has to manually verify that every reference label ('processor 235', 'memory 240', 'display 245') is used consistently across the specification, claims, and drawings — one mislabelled reference or antecedent basis error can trigger a USPTO objection that costs the client $2,000+ in additional prosecution fees and delays the application by months
Litigation partner needs an expert witness in underwater welding metallurgy for a maritime injury case — the paralegal spends two weeks cold-calling university departments and professional associations, the expert they find has never testified before, and the opposing counsel's Daubert challenge succeeds because nobody checked the expert's litigation history
When my litigation team receives 100,000 documents in discovery and the partner wants an early case assessment by Friday, I need to understand the key facts, players, and timeline before we've even started formal review — but right now the only option is throwing associate hours at it and hoping we surface the right documents
Executor inherits a loved one's estate and faces 600+ hours of paperwork — locating bank accounts, notifying agencies, filing probate, transferring titles — with zero training and while grieving
I need a solicitor for my house purchase but every firm I call quotes £3,000-5,000 and can't tell me the total cost upfront — I end up choosing blindly, getting surprise bills, and the process drags on for months with no visibility into what's actually happening
Criminal defense attorney gets 34,000 pages of discovery from the prosecution — body cam footage, phone records, texts, witness statements, police reports — and has 60 days to find the needle in the haystack that proves their client's innocence. Manual review would take weeks they don't have, and the critical exculpatory detail is buried on page 28,347
Defense team is preparing for trial in 3 weeks and needs to build a coherent timeline from fragmented evidence — witness statements contradict each other, body cam timestamps don't align, and critical connections between defendants are buried across thousands of documents
Evidence in criminal cases comes in formats that eDiscovery tools weren't built for — body cam video, jail phone calls, surveillance footage, text message exports — and the attorney needs to search and cross-reference across all of it like they would with documents
Public defender with 150 active cases doesn't have time to thoroughly review discovery in each one — the office is so under-resourced that attorneys get 15 minutes to review a case file before arraignment, and evidence that could support a dismissal or better plea deal sits unread because there simply aren't enough hours
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Matey
Criminal defense attorney receives discovery from prosecution — thousands of pages of police reports, body cam footage, phone records, witness statements, surveillance video. Attorney needs to find exculpatory evidence, identify inconsistencies in witness accounts, and build a defense timeline. Traditional approach: weeks of manual review or outsourcing to expensive eDiscovery vendors charging per-GB fees.
After Matey
After CrimD analysis → attorney has case summary, entity relationship map, and timeline → uses these to prepare motions (suppression, dismissal), build trial strategy, prepare cross-examination outlines. Outputs feed into brief drafting and trial preparation.
Integrations & hand-offs
Prosecution discovery production → Matey CrimD (upload via drag-and-drop, analyze, summarize) → attorney's case management system / trial prep. No documented integrations with case management or practice management tools — standalone upload-based workflow. NACDL/SCACDL partnerships provide channel to criminal defense bar.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…