Other
Agilelaw
AgileLaw is an Austin-based electronic exhibit management platform for litigators handling depositions, hearings, arbitrations, and trial. The product is built around paperless exhibit prep and live presentation: attorneys and paralegals upload exhibits, organize them by witness or matter, mark and reveal documents during proceedings, and share the same exhibit view across web and tablet apps. Vendor materials claim 3,200 attorneys from 1,200 firms have used the platform in 26,000+ proceedings, with testimonials from Janik Vinnakota, Choate Law Firm, Miller Legal Partners, Susman Godfrey, Nelson Mullins, McKool Smith, and Sarrett Law Firm. Pricing is unusually transparent for this niche: free starter access with $195 pay-per-host session, $200/month Essentials for solo and small firms, $500/month Advantage for mid-sized matters, and enterprise plans with SSO, 2FA, HIPAA compliance, and a SOC 2 Type II report available. Independent validation is thin but not absent: G2 shows one review, the iOS App Store shows a 5.0 rating from three ratings, and a University of Wisconsin litigation-iPad guide still lists AgileLaw as a paperless deposition app. Funding is not publicly disclosed.
Company Info
- Sector: Legal Tech
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Agilelaw is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Agilelaw addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Litigator preparing for cross-examination has 30 depositions and 200 exhibits spread across separate PDFs — toggling between documents in Adobe Acrobat or printing everything to paper, losing the connection between what a witness said on page 47 and the exhibit that contradicts it
During a remote deposition the witness is looking at Exhibit 14 but the attorney can't see both the witness's face and the exhibit at the same time — toggling between video feeds and document shares means missing the witness's reaction when confronted with a damaging document
Arbitrator managing a 3-week commercial hearing with 200 exhibits needs to present evidence electronically but the hearing room has no eTrial setup — counsel are passing USB drives, projecting PDFs manually, and nobody can quickly pull up Exhibit 147 when it's referenced in cross-examination
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Agilelaw
Litigation team finishes collecting the exhibit set for a deposition, hearing, arbitration, or trial and needs to organize what will be shown, in what order, and from which device.
After Agilelaw
Once exhibits are introduced and shared during the proceeding, the team moves into witness examination, transcript review, motion practice, or post-hearing briefing with a cleaner record of what was shown.
Integrations & hand-offs
DMS or file share -> AgileLaw exhibit workspace -> live proceeding with attorneys, paralegals, witnesses, and court reporter -> transcript/briefing tools. Vendor-claimed integrations include Relativity, Clio, Box, and Dropbox.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…