Cloud Court is a litigation-tech vendor focused on testimony intelligence and deposition workflow rather than general case management. Its public positioning centers on two products: Gibson, an AI-driven testimony intelligence tool that ingests and analyzes deposition and trial transcripts, and Armatus, a SaaS module for realtime transcription, search, and collaboration during depositions. Public materials describe Gibson as helping litigators extract patterns, witness behavior, and actionable insights from testimony, while Armatus integrates realtime transcripts with eDiscovery document search and remote collaboration. Cloud Court’s security posture is more mature than many batch peers: the company publicly states it is SOC 2 Type II compliant, requires MFA, uses role-based access control, and manages full-disk encryption on company devices. Pricing is mostly demo-led, though a marketplace listing shows Gibson starting at $2,000/month.
Company Info
- Founded: 2017
- Team size: 1-10 employees
- Funding: $2.5M
- HQ: United States
- Sector: Litigation, Translation Software
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Cloud Court is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Cloud Court addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Senior partner preparing for cross-examination of a key witness in a multi-billion-dollar commercial dispute knows the witness's deposition testimony contradicts three earlier board meeting minutes — but finding those specific inconsistencies across 200,000 documents took a team of associates 6 weeks, and the partner suspects there are more contradictions buried in the record that nobody found
Litigation attorney takes a 4-hour deposition on Tuesday but the transcript won't arrive for 10-15 business days — by then the details are fuzzy, the next witness prep is rushed, and opposing counsel has already moved to exclude the testimony on a technicality the attorney can't remember clearly enough to rebut
Litigator has 200 pages of deposition transcripts and needs to extract the 15 key facts that matter for the motion — but reading and manually tagging each relevant passage takes an entire weekend, and there's no way to link those facts back to the specific transcript page when writing the brief
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Cloud Court
Deposition or hearing is scheduled -> litigation team needs realtime transcript access, document search, and a better way to turn testimony into preparation intelligence for the next witness, motion, or trial exam
After Cloud Court
Cloud Court captures or ingests transcript data -> Gibson organizes and analyzes testimony to surface facts, patterns, and witness behavior -> litigation team uses the output for witness prep, cross-examination, chronology building, and motion support
Integrations & hand-offs
Court reporter / realtime feed -> Armatus collaboration and search layer -> Gibson transcript intelligence -> litigation partner, associate, paralegal, and in-house team use testimony outputs in case strategy
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…