Everchron is collaborative litigation management and case chronology software for law firms and corporate legal departments. Founded 2012. $200K funding. ~19 employees, 511 LinkedIn followers, EV=390. Core capability: dynamic case chronologies that link key documents, facts, witnesses, and testimony into a unified case narrative. Key features: dynamic key document chronologies with timeline view, video transcript manager for depositions, automatically generated witness files (connects witnesses to related evidence), master file with drag-and-drop folder upload, Frozen Matter Archive (FMA) for matter preservation and restoration, instant document viewer (100+ file types), coding and annotation tools. Relativity integration — seamless document and metadata transfer from RelativityOne or Relativity Server. SOC 2 Type II compliant with bank-grade encryption (data in transit and at rest). EPIC program: free access for public interest organizations and pro bono teams. Bennett Bigelow & Leedom case study — ‘transformed quality and speed’ of case preparation using auto-generated witness files. AmLaw 100 firms, top litigation boutiques, and corporate counsel as customers. Blog discusses AI prompts for legal analysis but no native AI features launched — blog explicitly highlights ‘5 Non-AI Features.’ Reddit: mentioned in r/Lawyertalk chronology software thread but one user ‘tried and discounted’ it. Not found on G2 or Capterra. Pricing not published — demo-based. Competitors: CaseFleet, CaseMap (LexisNexis), TrialLine, TimeMap, Everlaw. Key differentiator: bridges eDiscovery and case analysis with Relativity integration — positions between eDiscovery review platforms and trial preparation tools. Auto-generated witness files unique to Everchron. EPIC program for public interest creates goodwill.
Capabilities
Spans 5 product areas: Litigation Management and Trial Preparation, Case Management, Matter Management, Knowledge Management, Depositions and Hearings.
Workflow Coverage
Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 5 workflow areas:
- Document Review & Management — Exhibit Management, Document Database Management (Repository for Archiving and Retention), Document Disposition Based on User Defined Rules, Version Control (+7 more)
- Filing & Compliance — Timelines, Access Controls, Encryption capabilities, Data Loss and Malware Prevention (+3 more)
- Communication & Collaboration — Integration with Microsoft Teams
- Research & Analysis
- Client & Matter Lifecycle
Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.
Company Info
- Founded: 2012
- Team size: 11-50 employees
- Funding: $200K
- HQ: United States
- Sector: Marketing & Intake, Case Management
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Everchron is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Everchron addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Litigation team building a case chronology across 50,000 documents, 30 depositions, and hundreds of exhibits does it in Excel or Word — no single platform connects facts, people, events, and evidence into a searchable timeline, so critical connections between a witness statement and a document are missed
Criminal defense attorney gets 34,000 pages of discovery from the prosecution — body cam footage, phone records, texts, witness statements, police reports — and has 60 days to find the needle in the haystack that proves their client's innocence. Manual review would take weeks they don't have, and the critical exculpatory detail is buried on page 28,347
Litigator preparing for cross-examination has 30 depositions and 200 exhibits spread across separate PDFs — toggling between documents in Adobe Acrobat or printing everything to paper, losing the connection between what a witness said on page 47 and the exhibit that contradicts it
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Everchron
eDiscovery review produces key documents → litigation team needs to build case chronology, link documents to facts/witnesses/issues, prepare for depositions → Everchron ingests documents from Relativity or manual upload → team collaboratively builds case narrative.
After Everchron
After chronology built → witness files auto-generated for deposition prep → transcript manager integrates testimony → case analysis informs motion drafting and trial strategy → FMA preserves matter post-trial for potential appeals or knowledge management.
Integrations & hand-offs
Everchron (case analysis) → Relativity/RelativityOne (eDiscovery source); → word processing (motion drafting from analysis); → trial presentation tools; → document management systems (master file). Relativity integration is primary data pipeline.
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…