AI-driven forensic accounting and financial investigation platform that converts raw banking evidence and accounting data into verified, court-ready financial reports. Core capabilities: automated bank statement extraction (OCR from PDFs/images), transaction reconciliation across multiple accounts/entities, AI categorization (transaction type, location, category, counterparty), Benford’s Law anomaly detection, fund flow visualization, and courtroom-ready reporting. Patented algorithms. Founded 2016, Boulder, Colorado. $8.5M Series A (2023, led by Silverton Partners). $21M total funding. ~51 employees. SOC 2 Type II certified. Named clients: Kaufman Rossin (600 bank statements to trial-ready evidence in 3 days), Capstone Forensic Group ($2.5M JV dispute), Todd Tracy (court-ready financial data). Former US Marshals asset forfeiture expert (Silk Road case) joined as VP of Public Sector (2025). Government solutions page (federal, state, local agencies). Serves forensic accountants, litigation attorneys, government investigators, and insurance fraud investigators. Reddit mention in r/Accounting. Press: Fintech Global, PR Newswire, Westlaw, LegalTechnology.com. 5 published case studies. Niche product — forensic accounting investigations, not general case management. Benford’s Law + AI categorization blog shows technical depth. No G2/Capterra reviews with substance. Pricing not public.
Company Info
- Founded: 2016
- Team size: 11-50 employees
- Funding: $21.0M
- HQ: United States
- Sector: Litigation
What We Haven’t Verified
This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.
Workflows
Based on practitioner evidence, Valid8 is used in these workflows:
What practitioners struggle with
Real frustrations from legal professionals — the problems Valid8 addresses (or should address). Sourced from practitioner reviews, Reddit threads, and case studies.
Managing 200+ open PI cases with medical records, deadlines, and lien tracking in spreadsheets — one missed statute of limitations and the firm faces malpractice
Trust accounting is a disbarment minefield — one misposted IOLTA transaction means commingling client funds, and generic accounting software like QuickBooks doesn't understand the bar's three-way reconciliation requirements
When my litigation team receives 100,000 documents in discovery and the partner wants an early case assessment by Friday, I need to understand the key facts, players, and timeline before we've even started formal review — but right now the only option is throwing associate hours at it and hoping we surface the right documents
Senior associate preparing for a 3-week commercial fraud trial has 200,000 documents in the review platform but no way to automatically identify where Witness A's account of a meeting contradicts the email chain from that same day — the team manually cross-references depositions against contemporaneous documents, and a critical inconsistency in the opposing party's timeline only surfaces during cross-examination when it's too late to build the impeachment narrative
Litigation attorney preparing for a commercial fraud trial has 600 bank statements from 12 accounts spanning 5 years — the forensic accountant spends three weeks manually reading each statement, entering transactions into Excel, cross-referencing between accounts, and building fund-flow charts that the jury can understand, and any error in this manual process could undermine the entire case at trial
Forensic accountant on a fraud case has 3 years of bank statements, 10,000 cancelled checks, and a box of deposit slips — manually entering each transaction into a spreadsheet takes weeks, and one typo in a routing number means the fund-tracing analysis is wrong
Forensic accountant investigating a Ponzi scheme has 3 years of bank statements from 12 accounts and needs to trace $4M in funds through layers of shell companies — manually reconciling transfers in Excel takes weeks and one missed transaction means the whole tracing analysis falls apart
Forensic accountant on a commercial fraud case receives 600 bank statements as scanned PDFs — manually extracting, categorizing, and reconciling the transactions across 15 accounts would take three associates six weeks, and the trial date is in 30 days
Litigation partner presenting a complex financial fraud case to a jury needs to show where the money went — but the forensic accountant's Excel spreadsheets with 50,000 transactions make the jury's eyes glaze over, and opposing counsel argues the analysis is incomplete because nobody manually verified every transaction
Where it fits in your workflow
Before Valid8
Financial fraud suspected → forensic accountant engaged → subpoenas issued for bank records → bank statements arrive as scanned PDFs (hundreds to thousands of pages) → manual extraction begins
After Valid8
Verified financial data → fund flow analysis → anomaly detection (Benford's Law) → courtroom-ready visualizations → expert testimony preparation → trial presentation
Integrations & hand-offs
Raw bank statements (PDFs/scans) uploaded → Valid8 extracts transactions via patented OCR → AI categorizes by type/location/counterparty → reconciles across multiple accounts → Benford's Law flags anomalies → fund flow visualizations generated → reports exported for court → expert witness uses verified data in testimony
Also used by similar teams
Community Data
Loading practitioner-sourced data…