Vendors who support open community conversation about their tools.
A Friend of the wiki has signed a short, plain-language pledge. The core: they won't penalise their customers for speaking openly about their experience or pricing on r/legaltech or rlegaltech.com.
Six principles.
By signing, vendor leadership — not marketing — commits to:
- Accurate informationKeep the vendor page up to date.
- Public pricingTransparent pricing — model and starting price at minimum.
- No astroturfingNo fake reviews, shill posts, or sock puppets.
- Honest engagementVendor flair on r/legaltech; disclose affiliation.
- Respect the communityNo unsolicited promotion.
- Open conversation with customers B2B pricing is negotiated, and one price doesn't fit all — this site doesn't pretend otherwise. We're comfortable with customers sharing ball-park pricing and honest experience, and we won't penalise them for doing so.
Early days — no Friends yet.
The pledge is new. We expect the first vendors to sign over the coming weeks, and they'll appear here as they do.
Are you a vendor? Be the first to sign →
Why it's worth signing
Legaltech contracts routinely contain confidentiality clauses, NDAs, and terms of service that could be read to prohibit sharing pricing or product feedback publicly. Practitioners are lawyers — they read the fine print and self-censor.
A vendor signalling openly that they're fine with ball-park pricing talk and honest feedback removes that friction. Over time, that shows up as better, richer information on their vendor page — more pricing data, more switching stories, more specifics on what works. Signing the pledge is in a vendor's own interest.
Friends are not ranked higher. Friends don't get featured placement. A Friend vendor can still receive low scores and filed dissents like anyone else. The only visible marker is a small friend-of-wiki dot on the vendor page and in directory listings — a signal to practitioners that this vendor has chosen to participate openly.