Proof

Est. 2017 HQ United States Employees 226 Funding $42.3M Updated 2026-02-10
Hype Index trajectory2024-04 → 2026-04 · 24 of 25 months
1.53× · UP +1.26Rose from 0.27× to 1.53× — more researchers than users now
0.0×1.8×3.5×5.3×7.0×2024-04: 0.27×2024-05: 0.25×2024-06: 0.31×2024-07: 5.16×2024-08: 6.36×2024-09: 1.42×2024-10: 0.27×2024-11: 0.25×2024-12: 0.18×2025-01: 0.26×2025-02: 0.26×2025-03: 0.24×2025-05: 0.25×2025-06: 0.18×2025-07: 0.17×2025-08: 0.76×2025-09: 0.30×2025-10: 0.22×2025-11: 0.17×2025-12: 0.17×2026-01: 0.18×2026-02: 0.15×2026-03: 0.24×2026-04: 1.53×1.53× nowQ2 24Q3 24Q4 24Q1 25Q2 25Q3 25Q4 25Q1 26Q2 26

How Hype Index is computed · prospect-to-user intent ratio over the 24-month window

What it is

Proof is not a drafting-automation vendor at all; it is a litigation-operations platform for service of process, filing-adjacent logistics, skip tracing, and related court-delivery work. The old repo record correctly recognized some of that, but it still mixed stale numbers, incomplete persona review discipline, and a branch-local pain point that should never survive review. In March 2026, the live public footprint is much stronger than a stub: Proof’s site now foregrounds nationwide service of process, AI Autofill for 60-second serve creation, real-time status tracking, direct chat with servers, dedicated Proof Specialists, consolidated billing, and a Serve Center workspace with team-level risk visibility. Public pricing is clear enough to be useful, starting as low as $75 per serve with no contract, while live pages also show address-based pricing, expedited options, and skip tracing. Security posture is materially better than the old file suggested, with a Trust Center and SOC 2 Type II references now surfacing publicly. The main caveats are that the brand term ‘proof’ remains highly collision-prone, formal review-site signal is still thin, and some process-server-side community chatter points to normal marketplace tension around volume and pay. The honest read is a real, well-adopted court-operations product for firms and agencies that need faster, more trackable process serving at scale, not a generic legal AI marketplace and not a drafting tool.

Capabilities

Spans 1 product area: Document Automation and Assembly.

Workflow Coverage

Based on published feature listings, this tool maps to 5 workflow areas:

  • Document Drafting & Automation — Automated Document Generation and Assembly, Conditional Logic Support, Language Support for International Languages, Process Automation (+8 more)
  • Firm Operations & Growth — Integrations with Document Management Systems, Integrations with CRM, Integrations with Digital Signature Apps
  • Document Review & Management — Document sets/Packages Supported, Extranets or Portals for Document Sharing, Version Control
  • Communication & Collaboration — Collaboration Tools for Document Automation, Integrations with Business Process Systems
  • Filing & Compliance — Encryption in transit

Workflow mappings derived from published feature lists. Not independently verified.

Company Info

  • Founded: 2017
  • Funding: $42.3M
  • HQ: United States
  • Sector: Litigation

What We Haven’t Verified

This page was assembled from publicly available information. Feature claims and workflow mappings are based on what the vendor and third-party listings publish — not hands-on testing or practitioner feedback.

Integrations

Platforms Proof integrates with. Depth — where curated — reflects how native the connection is. Uncurated entries render without a depth dot.

Deep — bi-directional API Medium — one-way sync / webhook Shallow — middleware / Zapier-class

Community ratings
Alternatives

Other Drafting & Automation vendors in the directory. "Compare" pages are editorial and coming as we build them.

Funding
  • 42.3MTotal funding reported by the TLTF directory · founded 2017 · as crawled 2026-02-09source ↗

Round-by-round data (dates, round names, investors) is not in our source crawl — only the total is shown.