Sub-workflow
Legal analytics (judge, outcome, citation)
Part of the Research & Analysis workflow
Case law researchStatutory / regulatory researchCompetitive / market analysisLegal analytics (judge, outcome, citation)AI-assisted research & summarisation
Who works on this
All personas on the Research & Analysis page →
Pain points (5)
What practitioners actually struggle with in research & analysis. Each pain point links to the vendors that address it.
4 vendors pp-0065 Litigation team needs to know how the assigned judge actually rules — summary judgment, Daubert, claim construction, sentencing — but that intelligence is locked in thousands of unstructured docket entries, so strategy runs on anecdote and a partner's memory midlargebiglaw 2 vendors pp-0068 Litigation firm needs to build custom analytics dashboards — track motion success rates by judge, venue, and case type across state and federal courts — but existing tools offer pre-built reports that don't match their specific strategic questions midlarge 2 vendors pp-0116 Patent prosecution attorney receives an office action and needs to decide whether to fight, amend, or appeal — but has no data on this specific examiner's grant rate, allowance patterns, or appeal success rate, so the strategy decision comes down to gut feel instead of evidence, and a wrong call burns through the client's prosecution budget on a losing strategy patent-attorneypatent-agentsolosmall 2 vendors pp-0278 IP department managing a portfolio of 500 patents across 12 art units has no systematic way to benchmark their prosecution outcomes — are their allowance rates above or below average? Are they spending more per patent than comparable portfolios? Nobody knows until the annual outside counsel review in-house-counsellegal-opssmall-firm-partner 1 vendors pp-0230 Tax attorney advising a client on an aggressive filing position needs to assess the likelihood of the IRS challenging the position and, if challenged, the probability of winning in Tax Court — but this analysis requires reviewing dozens of analogous cases, weighing factual similarities, and making a judgment call that's ultimately a guess informed by experience rather than data solosmallmidlarge
Vendors by rank (0)
Ranked by the rlegaltech500 popularity score within this workflow.
543 additional vendors outside the rlegaltech500 are tracked in this workflow. See all on the workflow page.