Sub-workflow
Court / opposing counsel communication
Part of the Communication & Collaboration workflow
Client communication (portal, secure messaging)Internal collaborationCourt / opposing counsel communicationTranscription (meetings, depositions, hearings)
Who works on this
All personas on the Communication & Collaboration page →
Pain points (3)
What practitioners actually struggle with in communication & collaboration. Each pain point links to the vendors that address it.
1 vendors pp-0100 Banking partner closing a $500M syndicated loan has 200+ conditions precedent tracked in a shared spreadsheet — counterparty counsel, borrower's team, and three syndicate members each maintain their own version, nobody knows in real-time which CPs are satisfied, and the paralegal spends an entire day before every status call manually reconciling five different trackers largemid 1 vendors pp-0111 We have 70 firms on this MDL and nobody can find the right filing or figure out what's been served — coordinating plaintiff committees, defense counsel, and the court by email chain is a disaster biglawlitigation-partnerparalegalmid-firm 1 vendors pp-0213 When I'm sharing client documents with co-counsel or opposing parties, I need to know that nobody at the cloud provider can access my files — ethics rules say I have a duty of competence with technology, and a standard Dropbox link doesn't cut it for privileged materials soloassociatepartnerin-house-counsel
Vendors by rank (0)
Ranked by the rlegaltech500 popularity score within this workflow.
112 additional vendors outside the rlegaltech500 are tracked in this workflow. See all on the workflow page.